The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3123 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
Before we leave the subject of improvement notices, you referred in paragraph 29 of the report to an improvement notice that was served in May 2022. You said that the notice
“also highlighted significant issues in relation to the accuracy of verified data to assure SPS that billing information is correct.”
That rang an alarm bell for me and reminded me of instances—south of the border, admittedly—in which Serco and G4S had responsibility for community payback schemes and were charging the Government for prisoners whom they claimed they were tagging who were either dead or back in prison. Is anything of that sort of order going on here?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
One of the particular risks that is attached to Barlinnie is the impact of the conditions on prisoners’ mental and physical health. In turn, that could potentially lead to litigation that is linked to human rights and equalities issues. Have you made any assessment of that? Is there a risk of a judicial review or some kind of litigation against the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
Auditor General, a couple of times this morning, you have used the expression that many of the issues that we have discussed cannot be resolved by the SPS alone. How would you see collaboration among the SPS, other affected public bodies and the Scottish Government working in practice?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the fourth meeting in 2024 of the Public Audit Committee. The first item on our agenda is for committee members to consider whether to take agenda items 3 and 4 in private. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
That is a useful thumbnail sketch of the three principal themes in the report, which we will consider in detail this morning. I will hand over to the deputy convener, who has questions about the courts custody prisoner escorting service.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
You have drawn a parallel—a wage comparator—with supermarkets a couple of times. However, the genesis of the contract is that it was outsourced work that was previously carried out by prison officers and Scottish Prison Service staff. Given the nature of the work that is involved, would a better comparator not be with the pay rates that the Scottish Prison Service pays its own staff?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
We are quite pressed for time, so I will move straight to Willie Coffey.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of questions to finish up this morning. Touching on that last subject, you are right, Auditor General, as always. You gave evidence to the committee back in September 2021 about the briefing that you had prepared on where we had got to with the Government’s stated policy of shifting to more community justice options. The evidence that was set before us at that time was that it is hugely less expensive for the state, and that the reconviction rate was noticeably different. Of those people who had served a sentence of a year or less in prison, 49 per cent were likely to reconvict within a year, whereas, in comparison, those serving community-based sentences had a reconviction rate of 30 per cent, so there was quite a marked contrast in the outcomes.
At that time, you told us that there was a lack of progress in shifting the balance in sentencing. Two years or more on, where do you see that? It obviously has a direct effect on the prison population.
11:00Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
Our second and main agenda item is consideration of the Auditor General for Scotland’s section 22 report on the Scottish Prison Service, which was released in December. I welcome our witnesses. We are joined this morning by the Auditor General, and alongside him is Michael Oliphant, who is an audit director at Audit Scotland, and Tommy Yule, who is a senior audit manager at Audit Scotland.
We have a large number of questions to ask you about this morning’s report but, before we get to those, I invite the Auditor General to make a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Richard Leonard
I invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to you.