The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3266 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
I had a meeting on that with the Scottish Trades Union Congress and relevant union heads in St Andrew’s house—I think it might have been in July or August. They wanted to feed their thoughts into the draft energy strategy and just transition plan in person, and they also made those points to me. The issue will sit more within the just transition plan space.
Again, I am not going to pre-empt what will be in the plan when it is launched. Given what I have just said to Mark Ruskell, the matter has been looked at, particularly in relation to the energy strategy, given what has been happening in the UK space, not just with policy but with some of the issues that have been brought up and decisions that have been made around legal proceedings, if I can put it that way. All I can say to Ms Lennon is that we engage with the unions all the time on the matter, and I had that specific meeting with them to go through some of the issues that she mentioned.
12:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
I had a meeting yesterday with the secretary of state and representatives from Petroineos. The company is going into stage 2 of its consultations with the workforce. It is starting to have one-to-one meetings with members of the workforce, particularly those that it has not been able to redeploy.
I have asked for more detail from the company on the workforce that it is retaining for the import terminal, the shutdown of the refinery and the processes that are associated with that shutdown. I have also asked for information on people who have other employment, whether in other parts of the Grangemouth industrial complex or elsewhere. Petroineos said that it would try to provide that for me, because it is important that we know what is going on there.
I am also due to have a review of the study that has been done. I refer to project willow, which is looking at the various commercial opportunities for the Grangemouth site. It is far advanced. The secretary of state had his discussion with Ernst & Young on that before Christmas. Mine is due next week, so I will be able to have a lot more discussion about it. Once that study is published, it is our aim to work with the UK Government, Petroineos and any potential investors that we have in the UK and Scotland on some of the opportunities that there will be for that site.
Some of those opportunities are exciting. I look forward to hearing more about the detail of project willow. It says to me that there are, initially, four or five particular streams of opportunity for what that site could become that could be really exciting for Scotland, the rest of the UK and the workforce at Grangemouth.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes. There is no agreement. We have a different policy on nuclear to that of the Labour Government, but there is acknowledgement that we do not want new current technology nuclear developments in Scotland.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
That is true.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
We have concentrated on the areas that have devolved implications, particularly in clause 5, but not so much in clause 6, which is about the company more generally, rather than about acting in the Scottish space. We have had those discussions. Clause 5 is the one that we really had to get “consent” into, because that makes the most material difference in terms of things happening in the devolved space and some of the issues that Mr Matheson brought up.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
I will wait to see the wording of the amendment before I lodge an LCM, but we have an agreement that that has been taken on board.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
That is a question for GB Energy, but there are things in our policy that mean that consent will not be given for new nuclear with the current technologies, for all the reasons that are on the record.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
I want to make sure that a fair share of the investment funding for any technology that goes to GB Energy comes to Scotland, so that we do not reinvent the wheel when it comes to the vehicles that are used to give out that funding. We already have well-established funding streams that have done very well and are oversubscribed. To increase capacity, we need to make sure that the funding that is associated with GB Energy’s funding streams in that area is coming to Scotland.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes. We look at EU alignment in absolutely everything that we do, both in terms of whether we give consent and in terms of our own bills. Nothing in this bill suggests anything in relation to EU alignment, so I am content in that area. It is a short answer, but effectively there is nothing that is an issue.