Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3780 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

I am suggesting that there may be ways to address the concern that people have raised about the fact that there is such a high a bar for proving ecocide. A formal connection could be made between the two offences—for example, through an alternative conviction provision. I am just putting it out there that that is worthy of further consideration. I have not yet decided what we might propose at stage 2, but that is one idea. An alternative conviction provision provides for courts and juries to consider a specified lesser offence if they are not convinced that a conviction is merited under a greater offence. I am not making that up—such a provision could be made.

Therefore, there could be merit in the bill establishing the section 40 offence as an alternative to the new ecocide offence. I am giving consideration to that as a way of addressing the issue that members have mentioned, which was already a concern for the Government. Ecocide must provide additionality to the existing law, but, given that it involves a very high threshold or bar, we could lodge an amendment at stage 2 that would establish a formal connection between the two offences.

I would like other amendments to be made to the bill to make it more in line with the 2014 act, because there are areas in which it is not in line with the 2014 act. I have mentioned a few of those in the past half hour.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

I am giving consideration to that. I will not use the phraseology of “switching”. I have been very careful in what I have said, because we have not yet arrived at a decision about what we might do at stage 2. Of course, other members might want to do something similar, and we could work with them on that.

An alternative conviction provision would provide for courts and juries to consider a specified lesser offence at the same time as ecocide. I presume, therefore, that a verdict could be reached that it was not possible to convict someone of ecocide but they have been found guilty of the offence in section 40 of the 2014 act.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

We are just suggesting it. We do not know whether we will go down that route or whether someone else will, but we thought that it was worth airing it.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

Consent.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

Right. It goes above negligence, does it not? That goes back to some of the terminology. Ecocide means

“unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage”.

That is the definition that is set out by the expert panel on the definition of ecocide. The definition also says:

“‘Wanton’ means with reckless disregard for damage, clearly in excess in relation to social and economic benefits anticipated. ‘Severe’ means damage which involves very serious adverse changes”.

I do not know how negligence fits into that. How would you prove that negligence was wanton? That is the issue here. Negligence can be wanton and reckless, but does it suggest a knowledge that what you are doing is causing harm?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

It is about proving it. If I may, I will bring the lawyer in on that.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

They would be working under the direction of the organisation, so I would not see any difference in that regard. Again, David Murdoch has the letter of the law, but an individual could be contracted to do something that causes wilful, wanton harm. The bill provides for the case where someone is

“acting as the employee or agent of another”.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

You say “proper”, by which you mean that the company is following the direction of the contracting company.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

No. They would be prosecuted under the 2014 act, which does not mention ecocide.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Ecocide (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Gillian Martin

I will bring in David Murdoch, because he is a lawyer.