Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3195 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 5 March 2025

John Mason

Another factor came up in our discussion with the Scottish Funding Council: just because of the volume of poorer households in a place such as Glasgow, we find that Glasgow Caledonian University and the University of the West of Scotland are doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Is it your view that they are getting enough support to do that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

It has always been a balancing act, but, given what was said earlier about social security in particular, which is demand-led, as, to some extent, is the health service, it strikes me that it is becoming increasingly hard to predict. There is more volatility in the budget. I am concerned—I do not know whether the Government is concerned—that it is becoming increasingly difficult to stay within the limit, which I understand is increasing only by inflation.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

Great.

I want to build on what the convener said about the £350 million or so contingency. If that is not required, and if there is underspending elsewhere, is there any danger that we get close to the Scotland reserve figure, which I think is £712 million.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

I have just a few points. Back in the autumn, after the UK budget, we got £1.43 billion of Barnett consequentials, which was more than some of us were expecting. At the time, the Government said that that was

“in line with our internal planning assumption”.

Is that still the case?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

Okay. That would suggest that those projects have all gone over the expected budget, because the Government is having to give them extra money. Is that the case?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

To an extent, ScotWind gives you a bit more flexibility, because we can move additional money in and out of that. Now is probably not the time to discuss it, but I still think that we need to discuss with the UK Government the figure of £712 million that can be deposited in the reserve.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

Okay. The Parkhead centre looks very good and it is beginning to open, but I am interested to know what it actually cost.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

Okay.

The Scottish Government’s guide says that, in the capital budget, there is an extra £67 million going to projects including

“Baird Family Hospital, Parkhead Health and Social Care Centre and the ANCHOR Cancer Centre”.

The Parkhead health and social care centre is in my constituency. Can you give us a breakdown with those three figures?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

John Mason

That is good.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

John Mason

I want to pursue a little further Jackie Dunbar’s point about Scottish index of multiple deprivation areas. I have just been looking at a map of my own constituency in that context. I get the argument that the index is perhaps a bit rough and ready—there might be better-off people in lower deciles and poorer people in other areas—but is it not a good clear-cut measure that people understand? Once we start bringing in this, that or the next thing, does it not all just become vague, so that it is then hard to pin down whether we are making progress?