The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2904 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
John Mason
Would part of the answer be to give the Scottish Government or Parliament more borrowing powers? Is that how you would deal with a more geographically specific shock?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
John Mason
That was helpful. In that one area of savings, there is, if I am understanding you correctly, going to be a short to medium-term impact but you expect that in the long term things will go back to normal. Is it the same story with regard to scarring in the whole economy? Is it that the pandemic and Brexit will have a scarring effect in the short term but in the long term we will just get back to normal?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
John Mason
Thank you—that was helpful. On a different point, I asked the OBR about long-term scarring effects, but we really got only as far as the pandemic. Do you agree with its assessment that the hit in that respect will be 2 per cent, which is a permanent effect from which we will never recover, compared with the position that we would have been in had the pandemic not happened?
My other question is about the long-term effect of Brexit. Is that a permanent effect, too, or will it be overcome in due course?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
Going from six months to three is quite a dramatic fall.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
That is helpful.
Finally, what about children aged from five to 11? Are we thinking of vaccinating them?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
My final question is for Sandra MacLeod, but anybody else can come in, too. When people are asked whether they self-isolate when they are meant to, 94 per cent say that they do, but figures show that in practice only 74 per cent do so. People’s claims are somewhat out of line with what they do. What is your feeling about self-isolation? Is it working? Are people doing it?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
Is there anything that we could do apart from paying the money?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
Mr Brewer said that the bill is unusual in that it will involve saving rather than spending money. I know that, if we left the 2008 act in place, the total cost could be £380 million, but what would an individual be entitled to instead of £500? Does Mr Brewer know?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
Does that happen if somebody gets Ebola? Has the 2008 act ever been used in that way?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
John Mason
Can any other witnesses help me? It does not look as if they can. I will ask the Government the question when it appears before the committee. I think that the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies said, as a comment, that we need to provide full pay and comprehensive support, but that would be expensive.
We are not looking at the payment level, but some submissions covered the figure of £500. I am not sure who to put this question to—perhaps it is for Susan McKellar. Is £500 appropriate? Has the system worked? You said that a lot of people have not received the payment. Should the amount be higher? Should the payment be organised differently?