The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
John Mason
As the cabinet secretary probably knows, I am a substitute member, so I am not quite so familiar with all the work that the committee has been doing.
I will follow on about conditionality. I presume that that is a lot to do with who Scottish Enterprise, HIE and South of Scotland Enterprise invest in. Maggie Chapman talked about wellbeing and fair work, but is conditionality on grants also linked to recipient businesses being committed to net zero?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
John Mason
Thank you very much.
The third and final matter that I want to raise is ownership—co-operatives and so on—that I saw in the committee’s letter, and in the Government’s response. The committee feels—I agree—that the co-operative model can be very good. It keeps decision-making in communities, and such companies are less likely to be taken over and all that kind of thing. Is the Government investing in co-operatives? How does it see the mixed model of ownership?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
John Mason
We heard a lot about vaccination passports, especially in September, when there was a lot of discussion about them, but we have not heard so much about them recently. Is it right that, in the next few weeks, we might make greater use of them? If a vaccination passport is required—I say “vaccination passport”, although I realise that the correct term is “vaccination certificate”—would a negative test also be accepted?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
John Mason
A few weeks ago, the number of people in hospital with Covid was under 500; on Tuesday, the number was 1,479 and, yesterday, it was 1,537. Therefore, the numbers are still rising. That is the key figure that I have been watching day by day. When numbers are still rising, is it not too early to relax some of the restrictions, such as those on huge crowds at football and rugby?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
John Mason
I take the point about balance. I suspect that you will give me a similar answer to my next question, which is about self-isolation. We were at 10 days for the self-isolation period and we are now at seven. I think that the United States is at five. How are we getting the balance? What is the thinking about exactly how long the self-isolation period should be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
John Mason
That is helpful.
The figure of 5 per cent sounds a little arbitrary. I think that you said that there was a deal between the two Governments. We sometimes have the problem in Scotland that the two Governments do a deal, but the Parliament does not get a look in. In Wales, it would be the Senedd. Was that broadly what happened in this case? What was the reaction of the Senedd? Did it feel that Wales should have pushed for more than 5 per cent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
John Mason
That is helpful. I will leave it at that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
John Mason
Thanks very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
John Mason
That is helpful. We are pressed for time, so I will move on and perhaps the other two witnesses can come in on that subject later.
Recommendation 1 on page 5 of your report says that funding guarantees should not continue. I understand the logic behind that, but I wonder how we deal with it. To me, the problem is that, when Westminster announces expenditure, we do not know whether it is new money or existing money. It would be better if Westminster would just tell us how much of it is new money. For example, if the UK Government is spending £5 billion on London crossrail and we are going to get £500 million, if it would at least tell us that £250 million of that is definitely new money we could then bank on that, even though it is not technically a guarantee. Is there a way round that issue? Otherwise, it takes us ages to find out whether we are getting new money.
That is for Professor—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
John Mason
I get the point about the unfairness.
I have one final point. On pages 45 and 46, your report is quite positive about the idea that we should have more flexibility in relation to transferring capital budgets to resource. We are allowed to put resource into capital, but we had not been doing so. Especially during the pandemic, the ability to transfer capital to resource would have been very useful. Am I right in saying that you feel that that would not damage the UK in any way and that it would give a bit more flexibility to the Scottish Parliament?