The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2867 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
I think that, when they do a bit of pre-budget scrutiny and report back, some committees wonder whether it really has an impact on the Government. However, linked to that, there is the idea that committees should look at financial matters throughout the year, which, I presume, would have an impact. Can you say something about the impact that committees are having on the Government in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
I declare an interest in that I am a chartered accountant. I think that some of my colleagues charge by the hour.
I was going to draw a kind of comparison. A company’s accounts have to be audited, and I think that most people would say that, although auditors get it wrong at times, they are independent. However, the financial arrangements for companies are very different. There is a legal requirement for financial accounts to be submitted, usually within nine months or thereabouts, and audited. In the case of banks, the timeframe is even shorter than that. I come from that background and might be biased, but do you think that there is scope for an audit of a public inquiry? That would still be independent. You spoke about finding the balance between independence and controls. Could the legal side learn from the accountancy side?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
I understand that you were involved in the inquiry in Jersey because, although you were an outsider, you are an expert in that field. I would have thought that, in a specialised area such as medicine, there would be a strong argument for having a medical person rather than a legal person in charge of the inquiry.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
Maybe I should have known that. Was blame part of your conclusions? As you just said, some people expect that. Does that vary among public inquiries in that some would attribute blame while others would not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
You will have 14 days between 11 and 25 June. That is not very long, and I presume that things need to be printed and all that kind of stuff. Will you be able to do all that work in 14 days?
10:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
The convener mentioned pay policy. There was criticism previously that you had not spelled out your pay policy. This year, you did—from memory, it is 9 per cent over three years or 3 per cent for one year, but the national health service has quickly settled for a two-year deal of 4.25 per cent and then 3.75 per cent. Where are we going with this? It seems that the pay policy sets a basis for discussion but that people then negotiate beyond that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
Some witnesses have suggested that there should be a pre-budget statement. Part of me wonders whether we need that, because it would involve yet more information being produced, but I suppose that the argument is that it would set out a broader plan before budget plans had been finalised. Do you have thoughts on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
There is an idea that inquiries must be chaired by a judge, and we seem to have got into a position whereby there is a hierarchy. People think that it would not be good to have a politician chairing an inquiry but that having a judge in the chair is the gold standard, which means that everyone wants that. It is difficult to unwind that, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
There were three people on the panel. In retrospect, was that good or would it have been better to have had five people on it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
John Mason
Someone else raised the point that people are hoping to get different things out of a public inquiry. The victims or their families, or the survivors, are the group that is key to the whole process, and they are often the ones who are demanding a public inquiry. In your experience, or as far as you know, are they, on the whole, normally satisfied with the public inquiry when it gets to the end? Jersey would be one example.