Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2559 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

I will follow on from that line of thinking around contentious issues and debates on social media. Vaccines are an obvious contentious issue, although I think that the majority of people were for them, so let us take the issue of masks instead. That is maybe a bit more of a grey area. People have said that some masks are useful and some are not, that no masks are useful, or that masks are very useful. How do you expect the broadcasters to deal with that? Should they give time to the anti-vax and anti-mask people as well?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

It does, but it leads me on to one or two further questions. Is it part of your role—or that of your office or your colleagues—to tick off or challenge organisations that misuse statistics or data, or that come up with false ones?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

Thanks for that.

Will Moy, your example involved pregnant or potentially pregnant women and the varying advice, which kept changing. I want to explore that example a bit. As I understand it, when the vaccines first came out they had not been tested on pregnant women. It was said that, logically, pregnant women would not be getting the vaccine to start with. That put a question into people’s minds that perhaps it was dangerous for pregnant women. Perhaps you can respond on this, too, Dr Holford—on this point about acknowledging uncertainty and avoiding false certainty. In a sense, that did happen with pregnancy—people acknowledged the uncertainty—but that in itself created a problem, did it not?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

Okay. Thanks.

Dr Phin, when you were answering the convener’s questions, I got the impression—correct me if I am wrong—that you were basically saying that the job of Public Health Scotland is to present the facts, not really to counter the misinformation, and simply to hope that the facts will eventually win out.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

I have one final issue to raise. Last week, people from the Royal Society of Edinburgh was giving evidence at an informal session, and they were quite keen on the idea of some kind of independent fact-checking service. Maybe that is what some of you feel that you are doing—people can check with you. Is that something that we should be looking at?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

That is great. Thanks very much.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Communication of Public Health Information Inquiry

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

John Mason

You said that broadcasters have to broadcast in a way that

“does not undermine public health information”.

However, the advice changed as we went along. In relation to masks, for example, some people claimed that they would harm us, because we would keep all our bugs and get more of them—or that kind of thing. What is the balance there? Perhaps the public health information has been wrong. What will happen then?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework: Ambitions into Action

Meeting date: 24 May 2022

John Mason

It is in the same area. At one of our workshops in Glasgow, the comment was made that the NPF should be more practical and not so aspirational. You are in that space as well. Is the NPF too vague? Oxfam made the comment that there is a lack of time-bound commitments.

I am struggling with this a bit. I see the NPF as being aspirational, which I think is good, but maybe it should not be just aspirational. Does it need to be more than that, or is there a danger that we would just end up with a set of rules if it said that A, B, C and D must be done by 31 December?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework: Ambitions into Action

Meeting date: 24 May 2022

John Mason

Keith Robson, in your paper, you talk about a national impact framework, which appears to be an attempt to tie the national performance framework and the sustainable development goals together. Is that correct?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

National Performance Framework: Ambitions into Action

Meeting date: 24 May 2022

John Mason

It is the third-last paragraph. You say:

“the SFC has committed to working collaboratively with the sector and key stakeholders to develop a new overarching National Impact Framework ... to ensure greater alignment”.