The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
I will follow on from that line of thinking around contentious issues and debates on social media. Vaccines are an obvious contentious issue, although I think that the majority of people were for them, so let us take the issue of masks instead. That is maybe a bit more of a grey area. People have said that some masks are useful and some are not, that no masks are useful, or that masks are very useful. How do you expect the broadcasters to deal with that? Should they give time to the anti-vax and anti-mask people as well?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
It does, but it leads me on to one or two further questions. Is it part of your role—or that of your office or your colleagues—to tick off or challenge organisations that misuse statistics or data, or that come up with false ones?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
Thanks for that.
Will Moy, your example involved pregnant or potentially pregnant women and the varying advice, which kept changing. I want to explore that example a bit. As I understand it, when the vaccines first came out they had not been tested on pregnant women. It was said that, logically, pregnant women would not be getting the vaccine to start with. That put a question into people’s minds that perhaps it was dangerous for pregnant women. Perhaps you can respond on this, too, Dr Holford—on this point about acknowledging uncertainty and avoiding false certainty. In a sense, that did happen with pregnancy—people acknowledged the uncertainty—but that in itself created a problem, did it not?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
Okay. Thanks.
Dr Phin, when you were answering the convener’s questions, I got the impression—correct me if I am wrong—that you were basically saying that the job of Public Health Scotland is to present the facts, not really to counter the misinformation, and simply to hope that the facts will eventually win out.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
I have one final issue to raise. Last week, people from the Royal Society of Edinburgh was giving evidence at an informal session, and they were quite keen on the idea of some kind of independent fact-checking service. Maybe that is what some of you feel that you are doing—people can check with you. Is that something that we should be looking at?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
That is great. Thanks very much.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
John Mason
You said that broadcasters have to broadcast in a way that
“does not undermine public health information”.
However, the advice changed as we went along. In relation to masks, for example, some people claimed that they would harm us, because we would keep all our bugs and get more of them—or that kind of thing. What is the balance there? Perhaps the public health information has been wrong. What will happen then?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
John Mason
It is in the same area. At one of our workshops in Glasgow, the comment was made that the NPF should be more practical and not so aspirational. You are in that space as well. Is the NPF too vague? Oxfam made the comment that there is a lack of time-bound commitments.
I am struggling with this a bit. I see the NPF as being aspirational, which I think is good, but maybe it should not be just aspirational. Does it need to be more than that, or is there a danger that we would just end up with a set of rules if it said that A, B, C and D must be done by 31 December?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
John Mason
Keith Robson, in your paper, you talk about a national impact framework, which appears to be an attempt to tie the national performance framework and the sustainable development goals together. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
John Mason
It is the third-last paragraph. You say:
“the SFC has committed to working collaboratively with the sector and key stakeholders to develop a new overarching National Impact Framework ... to ensure greater alignment”.