The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
John Mason
Yes, I saw your comment in your written paper that you do not think that 2 per cent is a good enough figure.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
John Mason
I will leave it there, convener. [Interruption.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
John Mason
Do you have a figure of where it should be?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
To continue on the finance theme, Colin Beattie asked you about a possible revamp of non-domestic rates. It is great that the committee has gone out to visit a number of sites, and I have picked up from some of the notes on that that quite a lot of retail businesses would prefer it if non-domestic rates were linked to turnover rather than to the value of the property. One of their concerns was that if they improve their property, the non-domestic rates go up automatically, which is a problem for them. Is that something that could be considered?
10:15Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
But people are not going to cycle 20 miles home in the middle of the night, though, are they? They need a bus or something.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
Thank you, convener, and thank you for the opportunity to be at committee today. It is nice to be back.
Alexander Burnett asked about online sales tax, and I take the point that we are waiting to see what the UK decides about that. What powers do we have? Could we introduce an online sales tax even if the UK does not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
I take the point that it would be a major change to move away from property completely to turnover. However, would you accept that it is a bit strange that two identical properties, one of which has a huge turnover and one that has a tiny turnover, might pay the same amount in rates? Obviously, there is the small business bonus, but perhaps some kind of hybrid might be possible. I accept that that will have to be looked at over time. Given that 1854 was rather a long time—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
Yes.
On the quite wider question of costs, the committee picked up a number of issues on the visits that we made to city centres. For example, parking costs tend to be higher in the city centre than they are out of town, which is an advantage for businesses out of town, and an older building is likely to have more maintenance issues than a newer building in a shopping centre out of town. The cost of closing a street was mentioned in Hamilton, I think: if the local shops want to put on an event—special Saturday—they have to pay the council to close the street. The message was that they are facing a lot of extra costs by being in the city centre or town centre. Is there anything that we can do about that or is it just up to local councils?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
John Mason
Obviously, if people live in the town centre, that is great and there are no transport costs. However, there is another cost if someone does not live in a particular town and is working, visiting or going out for a meal there and the public transport stops fairly early, as they will have to pay for a taxi home or something like that. Is transport part of the means to revive town centres?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
John Mason
I wonder whether the member has gone a little too far in the wording of amendment 119. I agree with much of what he has said: every child should have a laptop or something similar and an internet connection. However, if we took the amendment literally—when something is in law, we have to take it literally—it would mean that one child not having an internet connection would prevent a school, or possibly multiple schools, from closing. Does the member not feel that that is going a little too far?