The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
John Mason
Finally, paragraph 2.55 mentions the accounting treatment of PIP. That kind of jumped out at me, as an accountant. I am puzzled about the importance of the accounting treatment or why there was an issue there.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2022
John Mason
That was helpful—I think that I understand that.
I would like to touch on what the population report says about earnings. In paragraph 4.19, it says:
“We have seen Scottish average earnings grow more slowly than in the UK over the last five years.”
However, it also says that your assumption is that they will
“grow broadly in line with average earnings in the UK.”
Why do you think that there will be a change? Is that not over-optimistic?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
John Mason
To follow the same theme, as you said, Professor Leitch, it is important where we get our information from and Twitter is not the most reliable source. However, there is quite a lot of discussion on Twitter and that 20 million figure has been very useful. I have been quoting it quite a lot myself.
You said that you disagreed with Brian Whittle about the numbers. Can you give us any figures for how many people have a serious reaction to the vaccines or experience side effects? I had a sore arm and I did not feel well for 24 hours, which is pretty common. However, people are quoting this yellow card system and all sorts of things. You said the numbers for blood clots from Covid were “off-the-scale”. Are there definite figures about how many people have either died from the vaccine directly or indirectly or had a serious injury?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
John Mason
I will move on to a slightly different subject. We have taken a bit of evidence about whom people trust for information. This relates particularly to the Polish community and other ethnic minorities being a bit reticent and, in some cases, their having received information from the Government of their home country, be it Poland, Africa, Pakistan or wherever.
I was interested in the paper that Public Health Scotland submitted, which says that the most trusted people are the NHS, Public Health Scotland, health professionals and the Government, which is encouraging. Less trusted sources include social media, community leaders, religious leaders and news media, which struck me as interesting. I think that we had thought that if we could go to community leaders in some ethnic minority groups, they would be more trusted, but Public Health Scotland seems to be saying something different. Do you have any thoughts on who is trusted and who is not?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
John Mason
Thanks very much, minister. We have the message: more scientists—fewer lawyers and accountants.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
John Mason
Looking forward, rather than back, and thinking about working with the MHRA and so on, are there things that we can do in the future? Science is moving on and, as I understand it, we produced the vaccines much quicker than we normally would. That might happen again in the future, but that, in itself, gave people a wee bit of a lack of confidence. Is that just inevitable or do you think that maybe we could do something better in the future?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
John Mason
This is my final question. The Royal Society of Edinburgh was here early on giving us advice. There were a few things that it was quite keen on. It certainly wanted more science education in order to get the whole population thinking more scientifically, and it suggested the idea of an independent fact-checking service. Are you positive about those suggestions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
John Mason
Some of the external providers felt that they had capacity or could produce a little bit more capacity at a lower cost than the council could. There was a general comment that councils have a conflict of interest, because they are both providers—in one sense, they compete with the other sectors—and funders. Is there a conflict of interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
John Mason
We received data from 31 local authorities; what happened to the other one?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
John Mason
Right.