The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2559 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2022
John Mason
I am referring to the second-last page of your submission.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
That has been included in the financial memorandum.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
Thank you very much.
Another point raised by COSLA and others is that the present care service is funded partly by Government grants and partly by council tax and so forth. If, for example, a council spends £100 million on care services—I am just using round figures—£80 million of that will come from grants and £20 million will be raised locally through council tax. When the transfer happens, will the Government take the £80 million or the £100 million away from the council?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
The convener mentioned VAT. You said that the UK Government or HM Revenue and Customs would take a decision on that and that you were aware of what was going on. I want to press you on that. Regardless of what HMRC decides to do, is it possible to design a set-up that will mean that we do not end up having to pay VAT? With the police and fire services, we got into a situation in which Westminster, or HMRC, was being inflexible and we ended up paying VAT, which we would not otherwise have had to pay. Is it possible for you to design a system whereby we will not have to pay VAT, regardless of what Westminster decides?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
Could you not rule out VAT being paid because we will design a system that fits in with what HMRC wants?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
I will leave it at that, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
I will let you all come in in due course.
One argument for the new system has been that it would bring more consistency. It has also been suggested that the system would become more like the NHS, which is a national organisation. However, it strikes me that the NHS can be quite inconsistent. All the health boards do things differently, every general practitioner practice seems to do things differently, and so does every dentist and optician, as they are all private. There is quite a mixture in the NHS. If we move to a national care service, will it be more consistent than what we have now, or will there simply be a different kind of inconsistency?
11:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
Do we know how many care homes there are in Scotland? I assume that there must be hundreds.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
Is there a wide variety of legal set-ups that we could have for the care boards?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
John Mason
As the convener said, there is quite a lot in here. I understand the point that pay for care workers is not part of the bill and therefore not part of the financial memorandum, and that whether care workers get paid more is a completely different issue. However, the right for carers to breaks from caring is part of the bill. Therefore, should all the costs of that be in the financial memorandum?