The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
John Mason
Ms Heaney, I realise that you are not in the room. Do you want to add anything to that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
John Mason
I will start with Dr Shackles. In its submission, Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland said:
“While most GPs have heard of Long Covid”,
which suggests that some GPs have not heard of long Covid. It also said:
“Most concerningly, there remain clinicians who dispute that Long Covid exists”.
What is your reaction to those statements?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
John Mason
Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland, do you stand by the statement that some GPs have not heard of long Covid?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
John Mason
Your paper talks about the general practice nursing education pathway. Is the main way into a GP practice not necessarily directly to the GP but maybe through the nurse?
11:00COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
I recently met some GPs in my constituency who are working in some of the neediest areas in Glasgow—they are probably some of the neediest areas in Scotland. Among other topics, I discussed the following with them and they made some comments. I am interested to know the witnesses’ reaction.
The GPs were pretty sceptical about long Covid clinics. That was partly because of cost, and because they would divert money and people away from existing NHS services. The rest of the NHS—GPs and the rest—is under a lot of pressure, and they felt that long Covid clinics would, effectively, put the rest of the NHS under even more pressure.
Another point that the GPs made was that most of the people whom they treat who have long Covid have multiple other long-standing issues as well, so to divert people away for long Covid would make the service even less joined up. At least at the moment a GP can deal with all their issues—including long Covid.
The other point that they made was that the main symptom they hear about in relation to long Covid is respiratory issues, and they are able to refer people to those with respiratory expertise, which seems to be working well. They feel that the present system is working reasonably well.
Would anyone like to comment?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
Is the argument that resources might be diverted away from existing NHS services a problem?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
Is that my time up, convener?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
Jane Ormerod wants to come back in, too.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
Assessment centres, maybe.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
John Mason
Okay. I think that we are listening.
Ms Mcfarland wants to come in.