The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 983 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
It is a fascinating question, in fact. It relates to what the Parliament does in the next session and how it could pursue legislation that might quickly be overtaken by AI in a variety of ways. You are right in that the ability to access information could change completely, courtesy of AI, and the process could become much simpler. There is no doubt that that would inform the views of the Government and the Parliament about the future expansion of FOISA.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
We said in our response that we are not fully persuaded by the proposal. I understand the rationale for it, but I am simply putting the counter-argument, which probably reflects the fact that we are not persuaded at this stage. Clearly, it is a matter for the committee to take a view on.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Yes, it would be fair. I hope that the instinctive resistance to further roll-out that is sometimes encountered will be addressed by the experience of RSLs. It is human nature to say, “It’s not for us. It’s too much work. What a burden!” I well remember the resistance from RSLs, but—returning to the figure that I quoted earlier—within a year they were not experiencing the problem that they had expected.
All of us who support FOISA need to promote the message: the law is a good thing, it is right that it is there, and we should expand it. The concerns that have been expressed—the idea on the part of smaller organisations that the requirements are burdensome, and so on—should not lead people to be fearful of their organisations being captured by the law.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
There is not in principle.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
We have concerns about the prosecutorial activities of both in terms of legislative competence.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
There will be, once the care issue is dealt with.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
That is a fair question, but I refer you to what I said earlier. Although I can understand the frustration about the time that that takes, I am not necessarily sure about the alternative process. We have some concerns about how that would work in practice and are not sure that it would necessarily deliver the robustness that is needed. None of us wants to be in a situation whereby, after it has progressed something, Parliament could be challenged on the groundwork that was done before it decided to proceed or on the robustness of the actual process beyond that. That is our concern.
If Parliament is to have a process that is sufficiently—I am going to use the word “robust” again—robust to relieve it of any risk of judicial review, I am not sure that it could do things more quickly. However, I get the point about the time that that takes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
It is a mix of both. I will bring Ross Grimley in on that point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Just to be clear, we are not placing the burden back on the commissioner. It is simply logical to await his final report in order to understand whether there are any implications or read-across that should inform how we progress—that is all.