The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1652 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will give an example. In taking decisions, planners, councillors and planning ministers often have to perform a fine balancing act in looking at everything that is going on in a particular place before giving permission for an activity. Sometimes, advice is given to the effect that there might be an impact on a particular species, possibly a rare species, and folk are not certain about what might happen if permission is granted but have to make a decision about it. If they have made a decision in favour of granting permission and it is later found that there has been a major impact on a species—which some might regard as ecocide—what then happens and who is liable? Those are the unanswered questions that are in the minds of many folk. Again, that is about the creation of legal uncertainty.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I have a couple of simple questions. Cabinet secretary, neither you nor the Scottish Government has signed up to the agreement because it is an international agreement and, as you pointed out earlier, we are, unfortunately, not a nation state at this time. Would that be correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We will deal with it after the meeting, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests. Unison has been mentioned, and I am a member of Unison.
The bill does not provide a defence for an operator of permitted, licensed or consented activities. You will be aware that the committee has heard mixed views on that, with some people considering that consented activities would be unlikely to reach the mens rea standard of “intent of recklessness”. Extremely serious concerns about regulatory certainty have also been raised. Why did you take the decision not to include a permitting defence in the bill, and what is your current position on the issue, having heard all the evidence?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I welcome what Ms Lennon has said about her door being open to those who are likely to lodge amendments. My problem is that, as we have gone on with our consideration of the bill, other cans of worms have been opened. We have heard from the planning authorities, and, of late, I have been listening to elected members in councils who have just cottoned on to the bill. It is fine for us to be able to lodge amendments, but it is simply not possible to listen to all the concerns in the time available, and that causes me a huge degree of concern.
Some members were doubtful about how planners would see the bill, and those doubts have been shown to be justified. Now, I am hearing from elected members, who are saying, “I don’t know whether I would vote for that.” That must all be taken into consideration if we are to get the legislation absolutely right. I come back to my point about the level of unintended consequences that the bill might have, which we need to explore further.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Would you change any aspect of this part of the bill?
Again, I am seeing no one who wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Does anyone have a different view, or are you all agreed on that point?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It could change tomorrow.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good afternoon. The bill refers to “control” and uses “exclusive control” as a proxy for possession. We have touched on this already, but, in this context, would we benefit from “control” having a specific legislative definition?
Who wants to answer first? I will pick on the Aberdonians. Professor Yüksel Ripley, could you answer first, please?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Dr Patrick?