The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1508 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Give me an example of where you think that value has been provided for consumers and taxpayers here in Scotland.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Substantial sums of money come in from those levies. Give us an example of where you have made a real difference in relation to postal services. You have already said that you do not like certain things that are on the cards; I do not think that any of likes any of that. Give us an example of where you think that you have made a real difference to consumers in relation to postal services for the £193,000 that you have received by way of levy.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Can I stop you there, please, Mr Wilson? My office and the offices of all of us around this table have substantial engagement with the likes of Ofcom, energy companies, postal services, Scottish Water and others. Our resources as MSPs are marginal. I have the equivalent of three and a half full-time folk working for me who have to do a hell of a lot more than that. You have a huge amount of money coming in in levies to advocate for Scottish consumers, yet it seems very difficult for you to give me an example of any tangible change or tangible difference that you have made to Scottish consumers.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning—it is still morning. My first number of questions are for Mr Wilson, who, as chair of the board, seems to be in the driving seat today. Do you think that Consumer Scotland provides value for Scottish taxpayers’ money?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you, convener.
We have touched on some of the other alternatives to SAF, such as battery and hydrogen. Simon, can you give us an indication of how far advanced Loganair is in looking at some of those alternative technologies—particularly given the fact that you operate lifeline short-haul services? Although we recognise that battery storage and hydrogen will not necessarily be able to be utilised on long-haul flights, they will be able to be used by the likes of Loganair. Can you give us an indication of where you are at?
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is very interesting. One of the things that is extremely concerning is the “all the eggs in one basket” scenario, or picking the wrong technology, a bit like VHS and Betamax in the video world. In terms of the work that you are doing, you are looking at everything that is available—and that probably comes at a greater cost. Are Governments supporting the likes of yourselves as well as they could be in the hunt for those technologies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. Let us look at the infrastructure, in terms of not just electricity or hydrogen, but SAF. You have said that we have to look at all of this in some depth and there have been various discussions during the course of the morning about where folk believe that Governments have not been looking as they should at opportunities.
This is a question for all of you guys. At this stage, should there be an audit of where we are at, what the current infrastructure is and what can be reutilised, as Doug McKiernan suggested earlier, to ensure that, right across these islands, we can grasp the ultimate opportunities, whether those are—for Loganair—for electric or hydrogen-powered aircraft, or for SAF as a whole?
I will come to Simon McNamara first and then Doug McKiernan.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Sure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
It is fine, convener—I will wait.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
By the sounds of it, you have already done some of your own auditing of existing infrastructure. If you have been doing that anyway, there is no reason why the UK Government should not be doing the same right across the board.