Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1747 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kevin Stewart

Good morning. The convener said that we would return to HGVs, so let us do that now. Some argue that the uptake of zero-emission HGVs—electrically powered ones, in particular—is technically impossible. Could hydrogen be pushed as a potential fuel for HGVs? Could low-carbon fuels be considered as an alternative? Does the CCP reflect that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kevin Stewart

I am not saying that there are no electric HGVs out there—I know that there are—but the industry says that it does not see them as a viable option at present, and others say that they are willing to explore other areas.

On hydrogen, we have only three or possibly four hydrogen refuelling stations in Scotland, two of which are in Aberdeen. Is that an impediment to making progress on hydrogen? Is the fact that the UK Government is still stalling on changing the regulation on hydrogen storage and transportation a problem? Is that holding back the possible use of hydrogen?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Draft Climate Change Plan

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kevin Stewart

That is all fine, but you are not yet convincing people here of that. That is the key point. It does not matter what is happening in China with electricity or hydrogen—we know that China is putting a huge amount of money into that. How do you change the minds of people here to meet the climate change ambitions?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kevin Stewart

Thank you.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

Thank you very much, convener. I am not going to go over old ground and go back to the debate. I will be short and sharp this morning, because I recognise that the committee has a lot of work to do on the bill.

It is regrettable that the independent review of the Parliament’s complaints and sanctions regime has not yet been published, as any future changes to standing orders are likely to stem from that review. In some regards—as is often the case with things that we are doing—the cart may be a little before the horse.

However, I want to make sure that we do as much as possible to get the bill right. My amendments 6, 7 and 8 seek to make the precondition for the parliamentary sanction ground more general. As such, rather than requiring

“a motion by a relevant committee of the Parliament”,

the bill would require that the sanction be in accordance with the current procedure for sanctioning a member, which is set out in standing orders. That would help to reflect any future changes that may or may not come from the review. Any future changes to the parliamentary process that is used to sanction members will be on the basis that, whatever procedure is adopted, it will continue to be set out in standing orders. That is short, simple, logical and future proof.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

We need to see what happens with the review of standing orders. I have been pragmatic in all this. I cannot say that I am an expert in the standing orders of every Parliament or council in the country. I do not think that what I am proposing is, in any way, a massively radical change—I simply think that it is logical. With—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

I will.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

I will clarify and back up what the minister has just said. If changes to the sanctions process are made in the future, it is my understanding that this committee or its successor will be fully involved in assessing the proposals. That is right, and my amendments would do nothing to stop that happening.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

I will. I thought that I was going to be short and sharp here, but obviously not.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 29 January 2026

Kevin Stewart

Thank you for that. I will take your calling me an “interesting character” as a compliment rather than anything else.

I get the point that Mr Simpson is making about the timings of everything. I know that he began this work some time ago, and, if I remember rightly, it has taken 11 months for the bill to get to this stage. Sometimes, timings do not work out. That is why I am taking a logical and pragmatic view in my amendments, which would be easy to deal with and adaptable once the review is complete and comes into effect.