The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1652 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
You mentioned the RRA. It provides for certain defences. Do you not think that your bill should act in a similar manner in that regard?
The fear and legal uncertainty that some organisations express is not necessarily because they think that they are doing anything wrong at the moment that would lead to ecocide but because some future scientific discovery might show that something that they did over a long period might have caused difficulties. Those folks are quite worried about the unknowns. That is a genuine worry; it is not a blockage for the sake of blockage.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It is not great that we are dealing with the LCM in this manner and that, once again, the UK Government seems to be riding roughshod over devolved competences. It would be much better overall if this was an independent Parliament deciding on this as a whole, as an international signatory—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
This is a Parliament—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am sorry convener, but this is a Parliament and we have politics—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am suggesting, convener, that you should point out to me where, under standing orders, you feel that my question is inappropriate.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
We will come to consenting bodies, including planning authorities, in a little while, but first I am asking about the operator viewpoints. We heard from the likes of NFU Scotland, the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation and others that they have concerns about the fact that the bill could cover activities that have been consented to, permitted or licensed. Perhaps we could deal with the operators first, if you do not mind, and then we can come to the individual consenting bodies.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Convener, before we move into private session, I would like to make a point of clarification, please. I have had a look at chapter 12 of standing orders, which is on committee procedures. Earlier, you said that politics should be left at the door of the committee room, which I thought was rather a strange phrase to say in a Parliament, including in a parliamentary committee. There is nothing in standing orders—in chapter 12, on committee procedures—that says that that is the case. Will you please reflect on what you said earlier in your decision to close me down for asking what I think was a relevant question?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It is not me who has to be convinced on that but them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
A lot of the evidence has suggested that stronger enforcement of the existing law is as important as, if not more important than, creating a new offence. At any point did you consider strengthening section 40 of the RRA? At any point did you think that one of the ways of putting ecocide on the statute book would be through an amendment to the existing act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Equally, there is no defence in the bill that would prevent a consenting body from being held liable for ecocide. You started to go over some of the issues that we have heard about from planning authorities. Those letters came in after I raised issues at the committee on aspects of that matter. Some people did not really think that there was an issue with it. However, the letters from local authorities clearly show that they have concerns about that aspect of the bill. You said that you will work with the Government on amendments, but are there circumstances in which you believe that regulators should be held liable for causing severe environmental harm through authorised acts?