The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1747 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. The convener said that we would return to HGVs, so let us do that now. Some argue that the uptake of zero-emission HGVs—electrically powered ones, in particular—is technically impossible. Could hydrogen be pushed as a potential fuel for HGVs? Could low-carbon fuels be considered as an alternative? Does the CCP reflect that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Kevin Stewart
I am not saying that there are no electric HGVs out there—I know that there are—but the industry says that it does not see them as a viable option at present, and others say that they are willing to explore other areas.
On hydrogen, we have only three or possibly four hydrogen refuelling stations in Scotland, two of which are in Aberdeen. Is that an impediment to making progress on hydrogen? Is the fact that the UK Government is still stalling on changing the regulation on hydrogen storage and transportation a problem? Is that holding back the possible use of hydrogen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Kevin Stewart
That is all fine, but you are not yet convincing people here of that. That is the key point. It does not matter what is happening in China with electricity or hydrogen—we know that China is putting a huge amount of money into that. How do you change the minds of people here to meet the climate change ambitions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Thank you very much, convener. I am not going to go over old ground and go back to the debate. I will be short and sharp this morning, because I recognise that the committee has a lot of work to do on the bill.
It is regrettable that the independent review of the Parliament’s complaints and sanctions regime has not yet been published, as any future changes to standing orders are likely to stem from that review. In some regards—as is often the case with things that we are doing—the cart may be a little before the horse.
However, I want to make sure that we do as much as possible to get the bill right. My amendments 6, 7 and 8 seek to make the precondition for the parliamentary sanction ground more general. As such, rather than requiring
“a motion by a relevant committee of the Parliament”,
the bill would require that the sanction be in accordance with the current procedure for sanctioning a member, which is set out in standing orders. That would help to reflect any future changes that may or may not come from the review. Any future changes to the parliamentary process that is used to sanction members will be on the basis that, whatever procedure is adopted, it will continue to be set out in standing orders. That is short, simple, logical and future proof.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
We need to see what happens with the review of standing orders. I have been pragmatic in all this. I cannot say that I am an expert in the standing orders of every Parliament or council in the country. I do not think that what I am proposing is, in any way, a massively radical change—I simply think that it is logical. With—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I will.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I will clarify and back up what the minister has just said. If changes to the sanctions process are made in the future, it is my understanding that this committee or its successor will be fully involved in assessing the proposals. That is right, and my amendments would do nothing to stop that happening.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I will. I thought that I was going to be short and sharp here, but obviously not.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Thank you for that. I will take your calling me an “interesting character” as a compliment rather than anything else.
I get the point that Mr Simpson is making about the timings of everything. I know that he began this work some time ago, and, if I remember rightly, it has taken 11 months for the bill to get to this stage. Sometimes, timings do not work out. That is why I am taking a logical and pragmatic view in my amendments, which would be easy to deal with and adaptable once the review is complete and comes into effect.