The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1783 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will ask about acquiring and transferring ownership. Some aspects of that were covered earlier, in the discussion about the Westminster bill, including the third classification that Lord Hodge mentioned.
The Law Commission in England and Wales considered the concept of control of digital assets to be too nuanced to be helpfully codified in legislation. Do you think that the bill benefits from the use of control as a concept?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
It could be argued that exclusive control is a legal fiction in many real-world situations relating to digital assets—for example, when private keys are shared or assets are held in digital wallets. That leaves much to the presumption of exclusive control in the bill. In your opinion, is that the best way to legislate?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I have one more question, which may well be a daft-laddie question. We have talked about artificial intelligence coming into play. Professor Fox, you talked about a “person” having shared control. What if some of that shared control is held not by a person but by artificial intelligence?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
How granular should all this be?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is the UK Government, which is in charge of those strategies at the moment, of course with input from the Scottish Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I know that this is a statutory instrument, convener, but I just wonder whether the Scottish Government is the right body to write to. At the end of the day, this is UK legislation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
You gave the example of concessionary fares. If the Government came up with an assumption of how much that policy is going to cost in 2040, I imagine that there would be arguments galore around what the true cost would be. All kinds of things will come into play. What is the bus fleet at that particular point in time? What investment has been made? Has the fleet been completely decarbonised? The list goes on. No matter what figure Government came up with for that, there would be an argument for almost everyone that it would be wrong. Is that not the case?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
The oil and gas situation is very interesting. The North Sea is a declining basin. One of the major difficulties in all of this is saying, as Dr Dixon did there, that even if the use of oil and gas is not in your control, you should be dealing with it anyway, which I think is a bit nonsensical.
We also have to realise that there will be a continued need for oil and gas in years to come. Does Dr Dixon think that it would be better for us to continue extraction from the North Sea to meet the demands, or does he think that it would be better to import liquefied natural gas from the likes of Qatar or other regimes, at a much greater carbon cost?
In all of this, what is sadly lacking—and this is entirely down to the UK Government—is a strategy on energy security and assessments of what the needs will be and, of course, the carbon outcomes. It would be a bit daft, and it would blow everything out of the water, if we were to create an even greater carbon footprint by importing lots of oil and gas from elsewhere.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I want to have a wee look at how the plan is communicated to the public, who are often quite confused about these issues and who face messaging from various polarised viewpoints. I have been sitting here thinking about how we would communicate what is going on at the committee this morning. If we put it into a play and got it out there, we would baffle people. What needs to be done on the public messaging around the plan?