The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1645 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Quite recently, there has been an explosion in folk buying land, with some becoming large landowners very quickly. In your opinion, has that expansion, a large amount of which has probably been down to carbon unit pricing and so on, had a negative effect on smaller tenants, farmers and landowners?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
It has been trying to do so basically since the Parliament was created.
I am interested in your thoughts on whether carbon units should be property.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is really interesting. I will not ask any further questions, because we could probably spend hours on the subject, but it might be worth while for Professor Robbie’s work to be circulated among committee members.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. That is the first time that I have ever heard a bill described as elegant. At the beginning of the process, if you had asked us to describe the bill, the word “elegant” might not have come to mind first. Also, I have never seen so many professors give testimony on a bill—it has been interesting.
I will keep my questions simple. Once again, we have learned a lot this morning—Stephen Kerr said that at points he has felt like he is facing a conundrum, and I think that we have all felt that to a degree. Basically, you have said that we have the opportunity to ensure that we get the bill right, although, beyond that, we recognise that there is still more to do. There has been talk of specificity, but there has also been talk of uncertainty. To overcome that, it sounds as if we need to continue to monitor and scrutinise the effects of the bill as we move forward.
Gordon MacDonald asked about the advisory board or panel and whether we should rely on the UK Government. As I have sat here listening this morning, I have been wondering whether it is enough to have one advisory board or panel, considering all the areas of business that we are looking at. My simple question is this: is one advisory panel enough? Do we need to do more than that and make every Government portfolio look at the issue and see what is required in its area of business?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Maybe an advisory panel is not the way forward. Professor Schafer talked about individual expertise. Maybe, as I think Greg McLardie has suggested, the oversight needs to be built into Government at various points, with a recognition that a new breed of expert will be required on how we move forward on many of the issues. As a Parliament, we have built in various rules around ministers having to look at issues such as climate change or equalities—the list goes on. Is this one of those areas where we need to build in an overview as we move forward in day-to-day business? Alternatively, would that be too complex?
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Professor Schafer, you made a comment about a tick-box exercise. Sometimes, when we do certain things and tell people that they have to comply, that can become a tick-box exercise, but that is the last thing that we want to see happening here.
Can I be a little bit cheeky, convener?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Professor Robbie, I am interested in what you said about whether carbon units should be property. Can you expand on that? You also said that you tried to get some of that into the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. If the convener will allow me to ask you to, can you give us an insight into what you were trying to do?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I go back to my point that some folk feel that there is legal uncertainty around that. Having explored this, I think that there could be a number of unintended consequences from some parts of the bill as drafted. You have said that you are willing to work with the Government and others to amend it. That is admirable and we would expect that. I do not think that anyone is against the spirit of the bill.
However, I think that there needs to be some further exploration around potential amendments. Would you be favourable to that? Do you think that there is enough time in this session for us to take cognisance of the real concerns that have been raised by operators and consenting authorities?
11:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I have not come across anyone who is against the general principles of the bill. However, as the bill stands at the moment, there is a real fear about unintended consequences. I believe that some folk want to have time to feed in their concerns so that we get any amendments right.
My concern is that it is very late in the day in this parliamentary session, and I do not know whether we are going to do justice to the folks who have concerns, given the time that is required. I get Ms Lennon’s point about the 14-week consultation that ran from November 2023, but she knows as well as I do that folk sometimes do not come forward at initial consultations because they do not see how something will impact them, just as I do not think that the planners realised how much the bill could impact them until they got that letter.