The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 869 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. As you quite rightly said, cabinet secretary, the bill will not come fully into force until 2028, so I am keen to understand what we can do in the short term. We have had a number of cybersecurity breaches—Western Isles Council in 2023, and West Lothian Council and Glasgow City Council in 2025—and reports into those incidents suggest that they were partly due to overdue information technology health checks, a lapse in public service network certifications and untested incident response plans.
Given that these attacks happen regularly and that the bill will not come fully into force until 2028, what can we do in the short term to make sure that Scottish public services are looking after the nuts and bolts of the system before they have to worry about ransomware?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. I have a question about safeguards for Scottish industry. Since 2008, many financial services jobs have been offshored to India. There is a large textile industry in India, and Scotland has its own textile and apparel industry. Is there a danger that, when it comes to public contracts, those industries could be exposed and we could lose market share? That would have an impact on Scottish businesses.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
If we make a recommendation that the panel should be totally separate or that there should be representation on the English panel, how would that come about? Would there be an amendment to the bill, or would it require further legislation?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
My final point is slightly different. Earlier, you said that Scotland and the UK are not behind the curve on this issue. However, this morning I read—I had better read this out properly—that HashKey Holdings Ltd in Hong Kong is the first crypto company to list in Hong Kong at $206 million. Is the UK not behind the curve? Those transactions are already taking place.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. I want to ask you about a panel of experts. Over the past few weeks, we have heard conflicting evidence about whether Scotland should have a separate panel of experts to provide guidance. It has been suggested that the guidance of the English panel, which has been established since 2020, is publicly available and is neutral to any legal system. However, others have highlighted that Scots property law is very distinct from English property law and that the focus south of the border is very much on financial services, and there are concerns about how people are appointed and about transparency and output. What is the Government’s view on the establishment of a panel of experts? Should there be representation on the English panel, or should a distinct Scottish panel be created?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
All three of you mentioned that we require an expert group, but we heard evidence from Professor Fox that the UK jurisdiction task force was sufficient, because the advice that was given would be publicly available and neutral to any particular legal system. What would you say in response? You raised it first, Professor Schafer.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. I am looking for clarification on some of the stuff that we have been discussing this morning. The bill is very much a foundation bill, if you like. However, Greg McLardie has referred to the need to protect farmers, while Professor Robbie has suggested the removal of carbon units. What next steps should the Scottish Government take in order to build on this foundation bill? What should it be looking at next to ensure that things do not go out of date?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You just said that we need regular oversight. Are the regulation-making powers and the feedback mechanism in the bill sufficient?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. I am just looking for a couple of points of clarification, because we have had a good discussion on the subject. I think that it was Peter Ferry who said that we need a team of experts to assist with the whole process. Last week, I asked Professor David Fox some questions, and he suggested that any guidance that comes from the expert group that was created south of the border in England and Wales would be neutral to any particular legal system. Is that enough to guarantee and take into consideration the separate needs of Scots law, or should we have a separate Scottish expert group?
11:00Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Gordon MacDonald
My other point relates to what you have just said. The bill is short and is limited in its scope, quite rightly. It is very much a foundation bill. If we want to ensure that Scotland is a safe place to do business, and noting that we have to get the balance right, what should the next step be, given that there will be a new Government after the election in May next year? What should be the focus of the legislative process in order to maintain momentum in this area, given that legislation could get out of date? This is a fast-moving issue.