The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 558 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Mark Griffin
You are absolutely right: as we heard at the committee last week, engagement with the public is vital. The message needs to be clear on what we are engaging on, what the proposed outcome will be and what change we are offering the public.
You have probably encapsulated most people’s feelings on the issue, cabinet secretary. Almost everybody has run out of patience with talking about council tax reform and the “unfair council tax” rhetoric. Everybody is fed up hearing about it; we just want to do something about it. Is there a risk that we might go out for another round of engagement and—again—nothing happens? We could face a real risk of reaching a point where everybody is totally fed up with the talk about council tax reform. We are getting to the last chance saloon for reform, and it could end up in a basket marked “too difficult to do”.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Mark Griffin
In the document “Scotland’s Framework for Tax”, which Willie Coffey mentioned, the Government states:
“We are committed to reforming Council Tax to make it fairer, working ... to oversee the development of effective deliberative engagement on sources of local government funding, including Council Tax, that will culminate in a Citizens’ Assembly.”
That document was published in 2021. Why did it take more than three years to get the engagement process up and running?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
Okay. Thanks for that.
My other question, which is probably for both witnesses, is about people who are on the lowest incomes and already have a council tax reduction. If we were going through a revaluation exercise, would you envisage any change for them? If they continue to receive a council tax reduction, will things just stay the same for them regardless of what the revaluation exercise produces?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
Thank you for that. You have pre-empted my next question, which was about the impact of revaluation on general council resources.
Another area that I want to touch on is the link between wealth and council tax. As a group of people for whom the capital value of the property does not reflect their wealth, renters do not benefit from any rise in property value, but they could be hit with a much bigger bill in some of the hotspots that we have talked about. Professor Heald talked about high-demand tourist areas—the Highlands and Islands and parts of Fife, for example—and there are high-demand areas in the city of Edinburgh. How would a revaluation exercise and a change to the system of local taxation support renters who do not necessarily benefit from any increase in capital value, whether on paper or anywhere else?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
Good morning. I had a question about how a revaluation exercise would impact on regional inequalities, but Professor Heald has covered that already. Before I take a deeper dive into some of the issues, does any of the other witnesses have comments on any regional inequalities that would be exacerbated by a revaluation exercise?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
Yes, I have a final question. A number of the witnesses have touched on lessons that we have learned from the Welsh revaluation. Is there anything that has not been covered that anyone would like to add to the discussion?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
I have a question for David Phillips. In your written evidence, you said:
“If properties were revalued ... on a revenue-neutral basis ... we estimate that around 60% of households would see little change to their net bill.”
How did you arrive at that figure? On the opposite side, what is the extent of the change for the other 40 per cent? What is the relative impact there?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Griffin
No, thanks.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Mark Griffin
I want to follow up on Richard Gass’s points about the difference between the pre-2016 pension and the one that has been in place post-2016 and how that impacts on pension credit eligibility.
Has any work been done to estimate how many pensioners have retained pension credit eligibility since that change happened and how many pensioners are potentially missing out? Given the wider package of passported benefits that come with universal credit, what is the financial impact of missing out on it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Mark Griffin
Thank you.