The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 973 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
No.
There is an extra £1.5 billion for the Scottish Government this year and another £3.4 billion next year. Scotland’s capital budget, which had previously been projected to fall significantly, will now rise by 7.1 per cent in real terms next year. The chancellor’s choices mean that the 2025-26 financial settlement is the biggest in the history of devolution.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
The new Labour budget is good news for working people and for public services in Scotland, but only if the Scottish Government chooses to spend that money wisely.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
The debate is fundamentally about the UK chancellor’s choices in our budget. The old saying is that to govern is to choose. We have no choice over some things, such as having to clean up the absolute financial catastrophe that was left behind by the Tory Government before we came into office. However, let us talk not just about one of those choices; let us talk about all those choices in the round.
The UK chancellor’s choices have given Scotland a budget that keeps the promises that Labour made during the election, ends the era of austerity and provides billions of pounds of investment in public services. Those choices mean an extra £1.5 billion for the Scottish Government this year—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
The resource budget this year is £1.5 billion more than it was when the UK budget was set in the spring. It is £3.4 billion more next year. That is £5 billion more for the Scottish Government to spend, along with the commitment from the UK Government to mitigate the impact of the change on our public services.
Across the UK, the chancellor has chosen to increase spending by £70 billion per year over the next five years. The Scottish Government’s finance secretary said that the budget was a
“step in the right direction”
and that it met a core ask of the Scottish Government, but it is for the finance secretary and this Government to choose what the next step for Scotland is. Will we see the radical new direction for public finance that has been taken in the rest of the UK, or will it be more of the same—managing decline and living with the consequence of successive bad financial choices?
This is a budget that chooses to protect working people and that makes sure that the wealthiest citizens and businesses pay their fair share in order to increase funding for public services. The chancellor’s budget can help us to fix our NHS, kick-start our economy and deliver investment for Scotland if we choose to do so.
Despite what many members would have us believe, the Treasury has clearly confirmed that it will compensate public sector employers for the higher costs resulting from the national insurance contributions increase. It is absolutely scandalous that the commitment from the Treasury has been misrepresented in the debate as it has been.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
I can understand why some SNP colleagues might be confused about some of the choices that Rachel Reeves has made, but—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
Thank you, Presiding Officer.
Let us be honest: the Scottish Government would not know a good budget decision if it looked it in the face, because it has been such a long time since it made one. Scotland is suffering from 17 years of SNP budgets that have taken us in absolutely the wrong direction. We are dealing with the consequences of a careless disregard that this Government has shown with our hard-earned cash. The choices that the SNP Government has made—
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Mark Griffin
It is good to hear that the Government is now adhering to the principles of the Verity house agreement, after last-minute budget announcements to its party conference and the breakdown of trust that inevitably followed from those decisions. Will the cabinet secretary share the Government’s planning assumptions for the local budget settlement to COSLA and local authorities in advance, to allow them to properly prepare for the coming financial year and to start to repair that relationship?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Griffin
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Griffin
I have a couple of questions about the proposed expert group, minister. What will the remit of the group be, who will it report to, how will members be appointed and who will provide the secretariat?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Griffin
Good morning. The annual report states that you were required to examine the appointment practices of one board during the year, and that resulted in a report of non-compliance with the code being made to the Scottish Parliament. Will you explain a bit more about that? It was the first case of that type since 2011. Will you give us a bit more detail on that instance?