The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 973 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Mark Griffin
It would be broadly helpful for the committee to get information on authorities that you have described as being in systemic failure, but I will leave it to the convener to pursue that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Mark Griffin
In previous weeks, we have heard evidence suggesting that the self-assurance approach to regulation could be subjected to more scrutiny. For example, Tenants Together Scotland members said that they would like to see the housing regulator
“carry out more regular checks on landlords categorised as low-risk to verify the accuracy of reported performance data.”
I have two questions on that. First, how can you give us assurance that social landlords’ performance information is checked for accuracy?
Secondly, with largely desktop-based regulation, is there a risk that it is potentially more difficult to pick up on culture issues in organisations?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Mark Griffin
I want to touch on an answer to a previous question. Some evidence from tenants’ groups has suggested that they would like the regulator to take a stronger approach when a social landlord’s performance is poor. For example, Robyn Kane from the City of Edinburgh Council area told us that the regulator identifies when performance is poor, and said:
“However, we do not see the benefit of that at all. It has taken more than six years to get some benefit.”—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 3 December 2024; c 35.]
How can tenants see performance improving at a quicker pace following an intervention from the regulator?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Mark Griffin
Is the cabinet secretary able to say when housing associations will receive notification of the amount of their individual allocations? Housing associations received that figure for this year’s budget only fairly recently, which meant that some tenders for work were no longer valid. Therefore, the timing of that information is crucial.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
I had previously asked about how small and medium-sized enterprise developers were going to be treated, and talked about the turnover thresholds that exist at UK level and the exemptions that are in place there. Minister, you spoke about treating developers almost on a case-by-case basis. Has any consideration been given to particular developers that have high exposure given the size of their business? Are there any concerns about the liabilities putting developers out of business? What discussions have you had about putting in place a similar scheme to support SMEs and for developers that might be swamped and put out of business by the measures?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
Minister, is the cladding assurance register operational? If it is not operational, will you outline progress to date? When might it be available?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
I am hoping to abuse my position as a committee member and ask a broader question on building safety. I visited a group of residents in Bathgate and they showed me the extent of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete in their properties. They gave me a really fantastic warm welcome, and they would be more than happy to extend such a welcome to the minister if he can talk to them about the issues of RAAC.
The issues that they raised about RAAC are really similar to the issues that we are talking about with regard to cladding. They are to do with access to finance, access to insurance, access to skills to assess properties and potentially replace RAAC, difficulty with selling properties, and communication from local and national Government. Is the minister in a position to update the committee or Parliament on RAAC issues that are affecting residents, as he has committed to do—and has done—on cladding?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
In a previous evidence session, Professor Gill and Professor Mullen talked about the lack of national data in areas relating to the complaints system. Generally, what data should be available to assist Parliament in scrutinising the effectiveness of the complaints system? More specifically, is anyone responsible for collecting statistics on the total number of complaints that are received by public bodies and not just the ones that are escalated to the SPSO? Do we have any idea of the proportions of those that are escalated and not escalated? Should we collect that information?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
Thank you.
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Griffin
My other question is on SPSO performance indicators. A previous witness told us that the indicators
“appear to be rather limited and narrow in scope”,
with few or no indicators relating to quality and customer satisfaction. Another concern was that previous customer satisfaction surveys were stopped because they were unfavourable to the SPSO. What is your response to those witnesses’ comments?