The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2176 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
I want to go back to the question about annual reporting on the financial sustainability of the higher education sector. For clarification, is it correct that you have received the information about new financial forecasts that you have been awaiting?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
Mr Yeates, do you have anything to add in answer to that range of questions?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
You said that you have been at SAAS for two and a half years. Do you fear that things will be lost in translation? We are hearing that none of this work is happening. I am not sure that I have heard a commitment on where the responsibility will sit—will it sit with the board or with a subsection of the board? You are doing a lot of important work, which could potentially be lost.
There is also the 10-year projection—we do not have time to wait 10 years for the system to deliver for our economy. It should already be delivering.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
I will bring in Ms Topley in relation to the concerns about the winding up of SAAB, which I also raised with the previous panel. The bill does not provide detail on what will replace it; that is all up for discussion. I have concerns about that. A lot of people who submitted evidence to the committee said that we could lose a lot of good value by doing that. What are your views on the questions that I have put? Is there another way of preserving what has been going on and improving the provision of advice? We are all acutely aware of what is needed in relation to the skills shortages, but the bill will not necessarily be the answer to that problem—it might simply shift organisational responsibility.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
The apprenticeship board.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
I fully understand your internal processes. However, we are currently in a very different space, with lots of different organisations, including Edinburgh university here in my region, coming forward with major cuts to their institutions and job losses. That information needs to get to us almost live so that politicians and all of us can scrutinise that situation.
I want to move on to governance questions. Responses to the call for views highlighted a lack of clarity on the proposals on board reappointments, on the skills and experience of council members, and on co-opting provisions. Can you outline further details around that and around the setting up of that, which you have said is planned?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
I agree that it is not about every single complaint being investigated. The petitioners would certainly point out serious complaints that have not been investigated. As an Edinburgh MSP, I am concerned about Edinburgh schools, but this is not just an Edinburgh issue—it is an issue across Scotland.
I hope that, at stage 3, there will be a workable way of giving the inspectorate a new opportunity to hear concerns and decide which ones it should take forward under the complaints procedure. That is why I have tried to keep the amendments open for the inspectorate to be able to do that. I am happy to hear the cabinet secretary’s view on the matter. The petitioners have a specific ask, and the amendments are just one step towards improving the whistleblowing and safeguarding culture in Scotland.
I move amendment 157.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
Like other members, I am very sympathetic to what Pam Duncan-Glancy is trying to achieve. However, I am not quite sure where she has got the six-month period from. I do not know what the cabinet secretary will say in her closing remarks, but perhaps something could be considered on the time period for serving on the board or having a refresh. Given the need to move the new organisation forward, I am slightly concerned about the six-month period creating uncertainty.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
The bill has no targets or minimum levels of rights, either for apprentices or for employers. Is that something that your members have highlighted and fed back to you on?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Miles Briggs
That goes back to Willie Rennie’s point about the local authority’s responsibility around inspection. Through the wording of the amendment—I wait to hear what the cabinet secretary has to say on it—we could look towards that documentation being included. To go back to my earlier point, it is about transparency, so that we can see whether any concerns have been raised. I do not think that it should take a freedom of information request to find out that there have been 150 concerning incidents—as was the case back in 2018—and to get full transparency.