The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7218 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
Amendment 14.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
Convener, I am very glad that I gave way to the minister to allow him to agree, albeit partially, with something that I have said.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
No. Technically, managing reseeding on grasslands could fall within the bill’s definition of muirburn. I believe that grassland management is truly important and it is really important for crofters to have that ability, but technically it could fall within the bill’s definition of muirburn, so there could be a problem with Dr Allan’s amendment. Although I support it and would like it to be agreed to, I hope that the minister, if my concerns are right, will work with him to ensure that crofters are given the ability to carry out management of grassland, which is so important to their practices.
I find Rhoda Grant’s amendment 149 interesting. I listened to her arguments and I am swayed by the amendment, so I will be interested to see how the committee votes on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
On the ground that there will be further engagement, I am happy not to press the amendment. I am also happy not to move any of the other amendments. I know that you cannot deal with them en bloc, convener, but I am giving you notice of that now, to save the committee’s time and on the understanding that I can further debate the matter with the minister later.
Amendment 22, by agreement, withdrawn.
Section 9 agreed to.
Section 10—Application for muirburn licence
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
I am pleased to speak to my amendment 20, which seeks to ensure that Scottish Natural Heritage, or NatureScot—whichever name it is trading under on the given date—should
“consult such persons as it considers likely to be interested in or affected by the code of practice, including land managers.”
I think that that is fair, reasonable and inclusive—which the Scottish Government claims to be, so I would be very surprised if the minister were against the amendment.
I am somewhat surprised by amendment 83. I must put it to the person who has moved it, Emma Harper, that she does not know that the use of all medication on land is covered by vets’ prescriptions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
I am sorry—I did not hear that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
I agree with Rachael Hamilton. I think that the minister referred to Alex Hogg, who is the chairman of the SGA. He is a man with huge experience of these matters, and he has supported the courses. Including such people in the consultation on how the courses should be drawn up seems to be logical. That is why amendments 180 and 16 seem entirely relevant to me.
I would be happy to let the minister in to give me some guidance on amendments 13 and 15. If not, I will push them to a vote.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
I am sorry, convener; I know that I should speak through the chair. I said that I understand that the number of days of courses, which amendment 13 deals with, is difficult for the minister and that amendment 15, which is also on the number of days of courses, is difficult. However, I would like to examine with the minister amendment 14, which is to do with reasonable cost, to ensure that the cost of training courses is not too onerous and does not preclude people from taking part in them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
The point of amendment 17 is to ensure that the bill complies with the grounds on which it was set out. The bill is intended to deal with upland moorland management and grouse shooting, so the rationale behind amendment 17 is to remove other birds that are not part of upland moorland management or grouse shooting, meaning that other game birds could not be added to the list of birds that are controlled under the bill unless they have reached a level of scarcity resulting in their being on the amber or red list.
The reason for doing that is that the industry is extremely concerned that, at a later date, additions will be made to the bill to ban the legal pastime of game shooting, which I understand some people are not in favour of. If the minister is truly clear on the reasons for the bill, he will support amendment 17 so that there would need to be a clear rationale for adding birds to the schedule, rather than that just being done on a whim.
The minister’s amendment 61 relates to birds of prey, and I am extremely glad and thankful that the Government has listened to people who use birds of prey for falconry. It is a legitimate field sport, and I have huge respect for the people who pursue it. In some cases, it ensures the survival and diversity of such species by ensuring that there is a captive breeding programme, so that amendment is good news.
I hope that the minister will carefully consider my amendment 17. Its aim is not to frustrate the bill but to make sure that it does what it says on the tin, in that it applies to moorland management and grouse shooting, not other shooting that is recognised as an acceptable form of sport in Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Edward Mountain
The point is duly taken, convener. I press amendment 17.