The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Edward Mountain
The Caithness Health Action Team has been around for a long time and has been instrumental in helping to resolve issues of inclusion, in relation to health concerns, for people in the Highlands. It is a strong advocate. I have supported Rhoda Grant and the Caithness Health Action Team in delivering their request to NHS Highland. There is a very simple answer, as Rhoda Grant has suggested, which is for NHS Highland to accept CHAT as a community organisation under the process.
I urge the committee to keep the petition open and to push on NHS Highland’s door to see whether it will include CHAT, because, by excluding it, NHS Highland is doing itself and Caithness no good at all.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Our second item is the consideration of a draft statutory instrument. I welcome Fiona Hyslop, the Minister for Transport; Bridget Bryden, the bus regulatory policy team leader in Transport Scotland; and Kevin Gibson, solicitor in the Scottish Government. Thank you for joining us.
The instrument is laid under the affirmative procedure, which means that it cannot come into force unless the Parliament approves it. Under the agenda item following the evidence session, the committee will be invited to consider a motion to recommend the approval of the instrument. I remind everyone that officials can speak under the current item but not under the next.
I ask the minister to make a brief opening statement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Thank you. You made a good point, which has been cleared up well. It was useful to hear that. Do any other members have questions?
I see no questions, so we will move straight to the next item on our agenda, which is formal consideration of motion S6M-10469, calling on the committee to recommend the approval of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 Amendment Regulations 2023.
Minister, do you want to speak to the motion or are you happy that you have spoken enough?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
I am happy that you have spoken enough, minister. Thank you.
Motion moved,
That the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee recommends that the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 Amendment Regulations 2023 [draft] be approved.—[Fiona Hyslop]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Before we go any further, I remind the committee of my entry in the register of members’ interest, or would you like to sum ups. I am part of a family farming partnership in Speyside. As such, we have regular interactions with both NatureScot and SEPA. SEPA is also a tenant on a small part of my farm, where it has a gauging station and a monitoring station to monitor water quality, which I encourage it to do. I have regular interactions with both agencies.
Since the committee’s last meeting, there has been a change in SEPA’s leadership. That change was quite abrupt, and for a small period of time, there was no designated chief executive—although I am sure that there has been effective leadership. Will that result in wider changes of governance and culture in your organisation, or were those aspects sufficient when the leadership changed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Okay. Our deputy convener Ben Macpherson wants to come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
That is interesting, because when Parliament discussed that we were told that no additional resource would be required. We will leave that there and move to a question from Douglas Lumsden.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Mark Ruskell, do you want to come in on this subject?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Go for it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Edward Mountain
I know where the figure came from: I am just not sure that I understand how they got there. Anything to stop it being a guesstimate would be helpful.
I have another question. If £2 billion comes from the private sector to invest, it will be selling on or trading the carbon credits for that. Therefore, it would be helpful for me to understand whether, if it is a public-private partnership, the carbon credits would be jeopardised because the terms of the agreement lock up those carbon credits and remedial work needs to be done to protect them. Who carries the risk? Is it the person who sold them, the person who invested them and oversaw the scheme, or is there a joint risk? What risk is there to the public purse? It slightly concerns me that once the money has been paid, those carbon credits will probably be traded for 80 years. Who will be carrying the can in 60 years’ time, if there is any infringement? Would it be NatureScot?