The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4875 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Edward Mountain
Good morning. My question is based around the fact that I hear of more and more people who write letters asking for answers and do not get a timely or full response, so they resort to FOIs because that seems to be the only method that gets a timely response. To be frank, I will admit that there are two organisations in the region that I represent that I have given up writing questions to. I just FOI them as a matter of course, which costs them money.
Of the FOIs that you look at, are you happy that the responses that you have seen are fulsome and open rather than closed and focused on an issue that has not been asked about?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Edward Mountain
The final part of my question is that I think that I have some FOI requests of one organisation that have been outstanding for four and a half months. It does not surprise me that three months is standard. Do you know which organisations across Scotland are performing badly? I am not asking you to name and shame them, but is there a view of who is not performing as well as they should be? Would there be some merit in publishing a league table of the worst offenders, to try to get them to lift their standards? I think that there might be some merit in that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
The next item on our agenda is an evidence session as part of our inquiry into Scotland’s electricity infrastructure and whether it is an inhibitor or enabler of our energy ambitions. This is a new inquiry, the aim of which is to scrutinise what electricity infrastructure will be needed to realise the ambitions that are set out in the Scottish Government’s new draft energy strategy and just transition plan. The inquiry will be a short one that will lead to a report to the Scottish Government as it finalises its strategy.
Today, we will hold the first evidence sessions in the inquiry with two panels that comprise representatives of a wide range of interests in energy. I am pleased to welcome the first panel: Stuart Haszeldine is professor of carbon capture and storage at the University of Edinburgh; Clare Lavelle is director of energy and advisory leader north at Arup; Emily Rice is the Scotland policy analyst at Solar Energy UK; and Tom Quinn is head of analysis and insights at Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult. Thank you for accepting our invitations to be here today.
Before we move to questions, I remind members and people who are listening that, as a farmer and a landowner, I have electricity transmission lines across my farm in the form of 11kV lines, which are the small ones, and 33kV ring main lines, which are the bigger ones, and I am in negotiation for a 132kV power line to go through the farm. All those will generate some income at some stage for me.
I want there to be no doubt that I have some interests. I will make that declaration as and when it is appropriate to do so. I do not believe that that prevents me from doing my job as convener.
The first questions are from Liam Kerr.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
The deputy convener has one follow-up question, after which I will ask a final question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
Thank you. If there are no other comments, on that basis, I propose that we invite Màiri McAllan to come to the meeting next week and give a short bit of evidence to explain the situation. I will also ask the clerks to write on behalf of the committee to the regulatory authorities to ask whether they would like to submit any evidence. That evidence might be difficult to gather in the timescale, but I will give them the deadline of Monday morning next week, so that we have time to consider it before the meeting on Tuesday. That is a logical way to deal with this so that we can fully understand it. If everyone is agreed on that, that is what I will progress to do.
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
We come to Collette Stevenson for the next lot of questions. [Interruption.] Tom Quinn, I would love to let you in, but my problem is that I am short of time. I would certainly appreciate your input but I cannot stop a committee member getting in, because I will have to live with them in future sessions.
I call Collette Stevenson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
Stuart Haszeldine, you made a comment that I could let slip by about the Beauly to Denny power line and the time that it took. Could it have been speeded up if we had thought about undergrounding it? I will declare that I was involved in it from an environmental point of view.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
Most of the upgraded power lines will follow the best route, which is where the 132kVs are. Those will not be dismantled until the next ones are put up, but the companies will want to keep the old ones up as well. A solution is to underground them. That is just an observation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Edward Mountain
I am sorry to come in just as you are moving on to your next question—I do not like to stop you mid-flow—but Collette Stevenson is quite keen to come in on one of the points that has been raised. I am happy to bring her in and then I will come straight back to you.