The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5059 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Mr Golden. The next amendment is Sarah Boyack’s amendment 105. Monica Lennon, will you speak to that amendment on her behalf?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I call myself to speak to amendment 118 and other amendments in the group.
Amendment 118 is similar to an amendment that Maurice Golden suggested. It came about because we heard in stage 1 evidence about the importance of separating waste. What happens if you do not separate waste? When we visited Binn Group, we saw a big pile of waste that was impossible to sort through because it had not been sorted properly when it was first disposed of. Binn Group and other recyclers said clearly to us that, if people separate their waste properly, it can be used better and the recycling of it can generate income to cover the costs.
The aim of my amendment is to standardise waste separation across Scotland. I was aware when I wrote the amendment that it would not work on the islands, because a lot of the waste there is incinerated, and they have a procedure for that. However, I felt that the evidence suggested that we should have a standard procedure across the 32 authorities in Scotland, which, clearly, we do not. There are probably in excess of 20 variations of the scheme, such that there are different colours of bins and different recycling is taking place.
We have all seen great examples—for example, Moray Waste Busters collects stuff and resells it at recycling centres, but that does not happen everywhere. We have to recycle on our doorsteps if we have recycling bins—which I do not have yet, because the lorry cannot get up the narrow road to where the bins are, so I have to recycle things myself. I am happy to do that, as are other people. They do it with clarity when they know which bin material is to go into, but there is some confusion.
I took the opportunity to speak to the minister prior to the debate. I stopped her on the way to lunch, and she said, “No—this is a bad idea. I am not going to support the amendment because of the cost involved.” I think that she was happy with the principle; maybe she will come back on it.
I suggest that this does not have to be just about bin colours. The bin lids could simply be changed so that everyone knows how to do things. I will press for that approach if amendment 118 fails to be agreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Will the member take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I am trying to go too quickly. Thank you both for your understanding and for forgiving me.
Amendment 105 moved—[Monica Lennon].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 105 disagreed to.
Amendment 107 moved—[Douglas Lumsden].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 107 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I remind members that amendments 47 and 48 are direct alternatives.
Amendment 47 not moved.
Amendment 48 moved—[Graham Simpson].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 108 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I remind members that amendments 51 and 52 are direct alternatives.
Amendment 51 not moved.
Amendment 52 moved—[Graham Simpson].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I remind members that amendments 53 and 54 are direct alternatives.
Amendment 53 not moved.
Amendment 54 moved—[Graham Simpson].