The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2278 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
We have had a bit of a discussion around finance. Continuing with that theme, I note that page 38 of the Gillies report states that a number of individuals, including Mr Fotheringham and Dr McGeorge,
“appeared to operate in isolation of facts”.
Did you?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Is Gillies wrong, then, in that assumption?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
But Gillies is very clear that those opportunities were not difficult to spot. It sounds as though you were asleep at the wheel. Did you enjoy the title of chair of the court while not being particularly keen to do the work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You say that you engaged in a “curious way”. Where was your curiosity when all this was going on and you did not intervene?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The report says:
“P9, P10 and P11 management accounts (April, May and June 2024) were produced in draft but never finalised into papers that reached UEG.”
Surely members were asking you where that information was and why they were not getting it. The report also says, on page 33:
“It is not clear why this happened or who decided that these papers would not be provided.”
You said that you were curious and wanted to drill down. Did you find out?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Fotheringham, your former colleague is saying that it is your fault. How do you respond?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I will bring in Joe FitzPatrick—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I do not think that we have cleared any of that up, but I will bring in some other colleagues at the moment, starting with Pam Duncan-Glancy.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I want to come back to and test the covenant point a bit further later. Mr Fotheringham and Dr McGeorge, in response to Mr Rennie’s initial questions, you spoke about underrecruitment being the big issue. That challenges the Gillies report’s findings, because Professor Gillies is very clear that the issue was the excessive spending over a significant period.
Are you challenging the report or do you accept that the issue was not underrecruitment, which many universities struggled with, but your decisions to continue spending at significant rates and increase staffing levels even though student numbers were going down? Gillies is right, and what you are saying this morning is not correct, Mr Fotheringham.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That was clearly not the case, because you have been bailed out to the tune of tens of millions of pounds of public money. I do not get an impression from you that you think that you did particularly badly. There is an impression that you could have done better, but you are quite complacent.