Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 11943 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The next question is, that motion S6M-03393, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the UK shared prosperity fund and what it means for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The result of the vote on motion S6M-03393, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the UK shared prosperity fund and what it means for Scotland, is: For 90, Against 28, Abstentions 0.

Motion agreed to,

That the Parliament agrees that the UK Government’s proposed arrangements for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) are more restrictive than the EU Structural Funds and fail to offer the level of autonomy and influence that the Scottish Government experienced under the EU; believes that the Scottish Government must have an equal role in determining how these funds are used; notes with concern a cross-party report from the Treasury Committee, which estimates that the total value of the UKSPF up to 2024-25 is a 40% reduction on the amount that the UK received under EU structural funds from 2014 to 2020; calls on the UK Government to urgently confirm that Scotland’s allocation of the UKSPF matches its lost EU funding, as promised by the UK Government, given the absence of assurances in the Levelling Up white paper; believes that at least £183 million each year is required to deliver this, and calls for the UKSPF to be fully aligned behind the just transition to a net zero economy.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 2 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

I propose to ask a single question on three Parliamentary Bureau motions. Does any member object to that?

There being no objections, the final question is, that motions S6M-03423, S6M-03424 and S6M-03425, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, be agreed to.

Motions agreed to,

That the Parliament agrees that the Aquaculture and Fisheries etc. (Scheme for Financial Assistance) (Scotland) Regulations 2022 [draft] be approved.

That the Parliament agrees that the Community Care (Personal Care and Nursing Care) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2022 [draft] be approved.

That the Parliament agrees that the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee be designated as the lead committee in consideration of the Legislative Consent Memorandum in relation to the High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill (UK Legislation).

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The next question is, that amendment S6M-03381.2, in the name of Paul Sweeney, which seeks to amend motion S6M-03381, in the name of Keith Brown, on a Scottish approach to the mental health and wellbeing of our veterans in each community, be agreed to.

Amendment agreed to.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Scotland’s Climate Assembly

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

In response to Mr Kerr’s point of order, I would say that I have noticed several members shouting across the aisles to one another during the statement. I have, perhaps, heard one or two voices more clearly than others. I would be grateful if, at all times, all members of this Parliament treated one another with the courtesy and respect that the code of conduct demands.

Now, are we moving on to the next question? Are you content—

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Scotland’s Climate Assembly

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

As members would expect, there is a great deal of interest in the statement and many members have indicated that they wish to ask a question. From this point on, I will insist that we have short and succinct questions and responses.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Committee Announcement (National Performance Framework)

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The next item of business is an announcement by the Finance and Public Administration Committee on an inquiry into the national performance framework: ambitions into action. I call Kenneth Gibson, the convener of the committee, to make the announcement.

17:06  

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Parliamentary Bureau Motions

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The next item of business is consideration of two Parliamentary Bureau motions. I ask George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, to move motions S6M-03409, on the referral of a Scottish statutory instrument, and S6M-03410, on the suspension of standing orders.

Motions moved,

That the Parliament agrees that the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2022 [draft] be considered by the Parliament.

That the Parliament agrees that, for the purposes of consideration of the second supplementary legislative consent memorandum on the Professional Qualifications Bill (UK Legislation), Rule 9B.3.5 of Standing Orders is suspended.—[George Adam]

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Parliamentary Bureau Motions

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

The question on the motions will be put at decision time.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Decision Time

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Alison Johnstone

There are five questions to be put as a result of today’s business. The first question is, that amendment S6M-03381.1, in the name of Craig Hoy, which seeks to amend motion S6M-03381, in the name of Keith Brown, on a Scottish approach to the mental health and wellbeing of our veterans in each community, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.