The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 11943 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The next question is, that motion S6M-03393, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the UK shared prosperity fund and what it means for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The result of the vote on motion S6M-03393, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the UK shared prosperity fund and what it means for Scotland, is: For 90, Against 28, Abstentions 0.
Motion agreed to,
That the Parliament agrees that the UK Government’s proposed arrangements for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) are more restrictive than the EU Structural Funds and fail to offer the level of autonomy and influence that the Scottish Government experienced under the EU; believes that the Scottish Government must have an equal role in determining how these funds are used; notes with concern a cross-party report from the Treasury Committee, which estimates that the total value of the UKSPF up to 2024-25 is a 40% reduction on the amount that the UK received under EU structural funds from 2014 to 2020; calls on the UK Government to urgently confirm that Scotland’s allocation of the UKSPF matches its lost EU funding, as promised by the UK Government, given the absence of assurances in the Levelling Up white paper; believes that at least £183 million each year is required to deliver this, and calls for the UKSPF to be fully aligned behind the just transition to a net zero economy.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
I propose to ask a single question on three Parliamentary Bureau motions. Does any member object to that?
There being no objections, the final question is, that motions S6M-03423, S6M-03424 and S6M-03425, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, be agreed to.
Motions agreed to,
That the Parliament agrees that the Aquaculture and Fisheries etc. (Scheme for Financial Assistance) (Scotland) Regulations 2022 [draft] be approved.
That the Parliament agrees that the Community Care (Personal Care and Nursing Care) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2022 [draft] be approved.
That the Parliament agrees that the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee be designated as the lead committee in consideration of the Legislative Consent Memorandum in relation to the High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill (UK Legislation).
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The next question is, that amendment S6M-03381.2, in the name of Paul Sweeney, which seeks to amend motion S6M-03381, in the name of Keith Brown, on a Scottish approach to the mental health and wellbeing of our veterans in each community, be agreed to.
Amendment agreed to.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
In response to Mr Kerr’s point of order, I would say that I have noticed several members shouting across the aisles to one another during the statement. I have, perhaps, heard one or two voices more clearly than others. I would be grateful if, at all times, all members of this Parliament treated one another with the courtesy and respect that the code of conduct demands.
Now, are we moving on to the next question? Are you content—
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
As members would expect, there is a great deal of interest in the statement and many members have indicated that they wish to ask a question. From this point on, I will insist that we have short and succinct questions and responses.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The next item of business is an announcement by the Finance and Public Administration Committee on an inquiry into the national performance framework: ambitions into action. I call Kenneth Gibson, the convener of the committee, to make the announcement.
17:06Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The next item of business is consideration of two Parliamentary Bureau motions. I ask George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, to move motions S6M-03409, on the referral of a Scottish statutory instrument, and S6M-03410, on the suspension of standing orders.
Motions moved,
That the Parliament agrees that the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2022 [draft] be considered by the Parliament.
That the Parliament agrees that, for the purposes of consideration of the second supplementary legislative consent memorandum on the Professional Qualifications Bill (UK Legislation), Rule 9B.3.5 of Standing Orders is suspended.—[George Adam]
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
The question on the motions will be put at decision time.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Alison Johnstone
There are five questions to be put as a result of today’s business. The first question is, that amendment S6M-03381.1, in the name of Craig Hoy, which seeks to amend motion S6M-03381, in the name of Keith Brown, on a Scottish approach to the mental health and wellbeing of our veterans in each community, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.