The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1936 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
If your analysis is correct—I have to say that I would agree with it—do you think that, in order to address concerns about public inquiries, we should address some of the concerns about public service delivery?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
From the analysis that you have done of the public inquiries that you have seen, do you feel that there is growing dissatisfaction with the delivery of public services in Scotland? Is that causing increasing anxiety, frustration and, in some cases, anger among the public because they do not feel that the money that they pay in tax delivers the quality of public service that they deserve?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. It is the same for me. I would have voted yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Liz Smith
I absolutely agree with Michelle Thomson on that. One of the most important things for that to happen is to ensure that we are accountable for public money. That is critical in the Parliament—we must have more accountability. Michelle Thomson and I sit on the Finance and Public Administration Committee, and we are always asking for that. Does she agree that it would help if we increased accountability for where public money is spent to ensure that it is spent successfully?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Liz Smith
It is incumbent on us all to celebrate the successes. However, when it comes to the statistics that are published by Mark Diffley and his organisation, does Kate Forbes recognise that there are serious concerns among those in the business community about some aspects of what they see as a rather threatening environment in Scotland?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Liz Smith
Will the member give way?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Liz Smith
Do you think that it is important that they have such a relationship? There are bodies across the UK that will have an impact on what might happen in any part of the UK. Therefore, if different legislation governs the public inquiries in different jurisdictions, surely it is important that there is co-ordination with the UK body.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Liz Smith
Last week, one witness suggested doing exactly that, as she felt that someone who was starting out on a public inquiry would gain from the considerable experience that exists as a result of other public inquiries that have taken place. I understand that that work could be done by the Cabinet Office. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you. That is very helpful. Mary Morgan, what is the reason for the growth in the number of public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Liz Smith
Would you agree with one of our previous witnesses who suggested that perhaps one of the reasons for the growth in public inquiries is the perception that Government agencies have been failing to address specific questions, leading to frustration among victims or people who are demanding a public inquiry that their questions are not being answered in channels in which they should have been answered? I think that we can all name public inquiries that are examples of that. Is that a serious problem?