The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1936 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Liz Smith
That is very good to hear. Thank you, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
I will concentrate on social security, if I may. I have two points for clarification.
Dr Roy, in paragraph 47 of your summary paper, you say:
“We forecast spending on the policy to mitigate the two-child limit will be £156 million in 2026-27, rising to £199 million in 2029-30”.
If I am not mistaken, that is an increase of around 27 or 28 per cent in a three-year period. Is that simply because of the number of youngsters that are involved? It is a quite substantial level of increase.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
That brings me to a point that was raised almost a couple of years ago, when the Scottish Fiscal Commission said that the introduction of the so-called light-touch reviews was a major factor in rising costs. It pointed out that 2 per cent of the reviews resulted in a claim being stopped, whereas the figure was 16 per cent for PIP in England and Wales. The Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice slightly rebutted that, saying that it was not the result of the soft-touch system but predominantly the result of awareness-raising campaigns and increasing public trust in applying. Do you have a more refined view on that, having had another two years of statistics?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
I am quoting the cabinet secretary.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
Do you think that that dissatisfaction is about the police service, or is there a wider issue about the delivery of public services and the public not getting answers to their concerns when public services have let them down? Is that a major influence?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
Mr McGowan, do you agree with that analysis?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
I think that I got most of that.
Professor Roy, at one of your recent breakfast seminars you rightly spelled out the challenge of having an ageing population not only in this country but across the world, which is having a major impact on social security budgets. Are the statistics for comparative studies available, and how easy is it to do those studies and to find out whether we have any exceptional trends in Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Liz Smith
If it were possible to address some of the concerns about public bodies not being able to give the answers to patients or victims, for example, that would make things much easier. It would ease the pressure in terms of the numbers of public inquiries that are requested if we could get the answers from the public bodies and, in some cases, from Government.