The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1086 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
In answer to the convener, you said that you are not able to provide timescales, should further amendments be needed. Might a number of adjustments need to be made or are you reasonably content that, should the order be agreed to, it will be effective in addressing most of the concerns that we have heard about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
In relation to some of the concerns that have been put before the committee, will the Scottish Government have on-going discussions with the relevant groups individually about their concerns or is today the end of the matter for that discussion process, should we agree to the motion on the order?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
My point is that, if that work is controlled largely here in Scotland through the on-going co-design process—this is an issue that we have had in relation to other bills—how are we to interpret the on-going costs of the on-going co-design? How can we do that when we are not sure what the co-design will result in?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
Thank you for that. In its submission, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland says:
“Historically we have found that generally speaking, awareness of Scottish taxes is not high in Scotland”—
I think that we know that—
“and there is a need for improvement of communications by the Scottish Government to ensure this improves, in line with the Scottish Government’s own Framework for Tax principles.”
We have heard quite a lot from Audit Scotland about the need for greater clarity and transparency on tax in general—what decisions have underpinned certain tax decisions, where the money is coming from and so on—so I think that the point that the convener and Michelle Thomson raised is a valid one. The idea of having a finance bill to improve that and to provide some extra clarity and transparency is quite appealing to this committee. I completely take your point that scrutiny of that would have to be done by Parliament, not just by specific committees, but we would be grateful if that discussion could go a wee bit further.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
Can you explain why you think that it is acceptable when, as you have admitted, there are so many uncertainties in it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
Mr Kerr, when Mr Greer was questioning you, he quoted the section of the financial memorandum that says that the precise split of funding across the tiers is yet to be determined. The financial memorandum goes on to say that that work is
“a key component of the codesign work currently underway”.
Can you tell us about that on-going co-design work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
Therefore, that work is not determined by external factors so much as by what is going on in terms of Scottish Government policy. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
If there are on-going decisions to be made through co-design, as the financial memorandum says, how are we able to scrutinise the costs of that on-going co-design if it has not happened?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
I associate myself with Michelle Thomson’s remarks, and indeed with the comments of Mr Greer, Mr Halcro Johnston and Mr Mason, because they have all, in their different ways, exposed a lot of the uncertainty that you, Mr Kerr, have admitted exists.
This is an important bill, especially for the support of rural Scotland, which has been at the difficult end of a lot of considerations in recent times. If you were in our shoes as members of the committee, would you accept the financial memorandum?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Liz Smith
I was grateful to hear your comment that you are open to having further discussions about a finance bill. Have such discussions taken place within your portfolio, or have they gone further up the scale to Cabinet?