The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3346 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I agree. These are not really questions for you; they are questions for the Government and the board. I shall leave it there.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
There is just this line from the Government, which we have heard and it has been confirmed in writing, that there is to be no more brokerage. The reality is that health boards will be running deficits. The health board that we are talking about now will be running a deficit. That is the reality, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Paragraph 15 on page 7 of the report—which we have mentioned already—states:
“NHS Ayrshire and Arran’s savings plans for 2025/26 are overly optimistic and are unlikely to be achieved.”
Could somebody explain what is overly optimistic about them specifically?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Graham Simpson
What a disgrace the budget was. What a disgrace it was that Rachel Reeves did not listen to calls to scrap the energy profits levy. It appears that she liked what the Conservatives started and she is doubling down on it.
Thousands of jobs are being lost in the North Sea thanks to the measure that was brought in under the Tories and made worse under Labour. Rachel Reeves should be ashamed of herself. She might have sounded the death knell for the oil and gas industry in Scotland, but the SNP cannot get off the hook, because its anti-oil and gas rhetoric has had an impact. The workers of Grangemouth, Mossmorran and elsewhere know who they have been let down by.
The cost of living is among the top concerns of voters across the UK, but we would not know it from the utterances of ministers in Holyrood. The SNP is currently demanding that Ed Miliband vastly increases the subsidies that are on offer to renewables. That is because, as the Tory motion rightly says, the SNP has an “ideological drive” to end production in the North Sea. It is a case of, “It’s Scotland’s oil, as long as you don’t touch it.” What renewables advocates do not tell us is that, since the subsidies are recovered through electricity bills, increasing subsidies means higher electricity bills for everyone, at a time when households are already feeling the pinch.
So, well within my two minutes, I say that, despite the hypocrisy of the Tory motion, I will support it and reject the amendments.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Will the minister take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Can the minister say who raised the query with the Scottish Government?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I agree with the cabinet secretary that the Clyde metro could be transformational, but we need to see more detail. She mentions that there could be some kind of update by 2027. Will that provide more detail on what routes there might be and the kind of transport that would be on them?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Households and businesses are already struggling with high energy bills, and offshore wind projects come with enormous costs. What assessment has the Scottish Government made of the impact on consumers of replacing affordable oil and gas with expensive and heavily subsidised offshore wind?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I am always happy to speak to Mr Gibson and to take up his offer of help.
What he otherwise suggests is not something that I agree with. I think that it is outwith the scope of the bill, but no doubt that will be tested at stage 2.
I am suggesting that a yes/no poll would be held across the region on a given day. That would allow the electorate to vote to keep or to remove the member by a simple majority. If the member were removed, they would be replaced by the next member on the party list to which they were elected—that would address Mr Gibson’s point. If the member is an independent, they would not be replaced.
Part 2 of my bill reduces the length of custodial sentence that results in the automatic removal of an MSP from more than 12 months to six months. It also provides that if an MSP does not attend parliamentary proceedings in person for a six-month period without a good reason, the SPPA Committee can recommend to Parliament that they are removed from office. The Parliament would then vote on whether to resolve to remove them.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I will take one more intervention.