The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Convener, it has been a superb session. The questions have been great; we have covered a lot of ground, and I have been fascinated to hear the views of the academics. I have just been reflecting on all of this, so if you do not mind, convener, I will give a small anecdote.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Unfortunately he was not—I could not get him to contribute. I think that there were issues at that time with the recall process in California, so Arnie was keeping schtum.
Convener, if I may, I just want to ask Nick McKerrell and Alistair Clark a question about non-attendance, given their strong views on the matter. Are you also suggesting that we scrap the law—because it is a matter of law—for councillors who do not attend for six months? Under the law, if they do not attend for six months, the matter can go to a vote of the council, which has happened several times in Scotland. Are you suggesting that we scrap that law, too?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I have been working on this for a long time now. At the start of the process, I attempted to reach out to Arnold Schwarzenegger through his office.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I have a reflection. If members have not done so already, I encourage them to read the bill’s policy memorandum, which covers quite a lot of the ground and shows that I have given deep thought to some of the questions that have been raised.
I know that I will be questioned in a few weeks’ time, but, if individual members feel that it would be appropriate and want to speak to me in advance of that, my door is open and I would be happy to discuss matters in detail. I will leave it at that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Graham Simpson
On that point, do you think that, if this is the committee that deals with such issues, it should have lay members, as is the case at Westminster and, I think, in Wales?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Where are the various locations that they work?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Graham Simpson
That is not a small number.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Graham Simpson
As things stand, the yard has said that it will need another £35 million but the Government has not said, “Yes, you can have it.”
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Graham Simpson
The phrase “light-touch approach” is mine, so you should not get too upset by that.
Given that that is your approach, what are the 40 staff doing all day?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Graham Simpson
They can.
I will ask about the Glen Rosa before I ask more questions about the yard. It was reported that the cost has gone up again by around another £35 million. Did that require ministerial direction?