The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2215 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is what my bill is attempting to enable.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
We do not have that approach because of our electoral system, which does not allow for regional by-elections. If we introduced regional by-elections for recall, why would we not have by-elections for a member who just stands down? That would be delving into the whole electoral system in Scotland. The concept of a regional by-election would be completely new.
I have tried to come up with something straightforward, and it really is. You might not agree with it, but it is quite easy to understand. It is fair that, as far as it goes, we cannot completely replicate the constituency element of recall in the regional system. It cannot be done, but I have got quite close.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes, I accept that. Glasgow is possibly the easiest area to do that in the country, whereas people would have further to travel to get to signing places in the Highlands, where they would clearly be more spread out. I imagine that that is already the case in elections. I am afraid that I do not know how far people have to travel, but I imagine that it is a lot further in the Highlands than it is for you or me in the areas that we represent. It is important that we get that right. A lot of that will be left to regulations and councils, so we need to work closely with them to get the right places.
Ben McKendrick wants to come in at this point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes. Let me put it another way: if we are being honest, nobody really knows who they are going to get when they put that cross on the ballot for the regional list. They end up with who they end up with. For that regional element, nobody voted for me individually—but if I were to be subject to a recall vote, people would have heard of me, because I would probably have done something. Then it is about the individual MSP and their behaviour—or alleged behaviour—not about the party. In my view, that individual should have the chance to make their case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Well, let us pick somebody who has switched parties: Jamie Greene. If Jamie Greene were subject to a recall vote and he lost, he would be replaced by the next person on the Conservative list in the region that he was elected to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It would be difficult. There are some very large regions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Let me put a different scenario to you. People switch parties for various reasons. They could have been mistreated by their current party. They might find coming into work a total nightmare and think that they cannot put up with it any longer. Would you punish somebody who was in that situation by subjecting them to a recall vote? I do not think that you would; it would not be fair.
People switch parties for a number of reasons that might not be about political opportunism. They could have absolutely genuine reasons. Somebody might just change their views. There could be a whole load of reasons, and we have to be careful before we go down that route.
It would also open up the wider question of why, if you are going to do something about somebody who is on the list switching parties, you would not do it for a constituency member.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
If you were to go down that avenue, you would need to explore that as well.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It was not easy. I consulted, but I did not really have any answers—until I had a light-bulb moment. That sometimes happens to me—I come up with things.
I think that I have arrived at a solution—I am not saying that it is the only solution, but it is a solution. What I have proposed is a fair and proportionate solution. However, I accept that there will be different views on that; you might have a different view. I thought that the evidence that the minister gave on that last week was very good. He seemed to get what I am trying to achieve.
I am trying to be fair to everyone. It is really important that we treat regional and constituency members the same, as far as possible. We are talking about taking away somebody’s job, at the end of the day, and that is a big thing. That is why I have arrived at the system that I have arrived at. It is not possible to completely replicate the system for both types of member, but, as far as possible, I have tried to do that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You are asking whether people should be able to disagree, and that is not an unreasonable proposal. Perhaps that could be explored at stage 2.