The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 635 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
Cabinet secretary, can you update us on the short and long-term investment plans for the NHS estate?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
GPs have complained to me about working out of repurposed cupboards and about patients having to use a car park as a waiting room. Will you update us on the capital funding for primary care infrastructure? What are your thoughts on the creation of not just new GP practices but community hubs that have a GP practice, links to the third sector, pharmacy services and post office and banking facilities, and can operate as a one-stop shop?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
Previously, as part of our work in this area, we have heard from experts on the use of technology to make the NHS more productive in various ways, from assisting diagnosis to, as we heard earlier, booking appointments—I think that the only time that I use the phone these days is for calling the GP; everything else is online or is accessed through apps.
Technology can also assist GPs by capturing and triaging patient data, as well as alleviating issues relating to delayed discharge. I have had patients contact me who were all good to go home but, because the medication was not ready, they had to stay in hospital a further night, which stopped someone else from using that bed.
We have active solutions in the artificial intelligence sector. How comfortable are you with the current use of technology? Do you have any plans for the future in that regard?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
I agree with Mr Ewing’s point. In addition, it would be useful to get an update from the Scottish Government on how it is monitoring local authorities regarding their interaction with affected residents. For example, in Aberdeen, there are regular updates and newsletters available to the public. However, such interaction varies from local authority to local authority. In my view, the Scottish Government should be monitoring the situation and perhaps sharing best practice. I hope that that is being done. I do not know whether that is a role for the Government or for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, but it should certainly be done. I would appreciate an update from the Scottish Government on that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
I think that we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that, as Mr Ewing and Mr Russell have highlighted, such a move would require funding. Moreover, the Scottish Government has reiterated that there is no plan to modify the current franchising process.
In closing the petition, we should do two things. First, we should write to the net zero committee—it is helpful that its convener is present today.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Maurice Golden
I understand the connectivity difficulties, particularly in rural areas but even in urban ones, and I appreciate that the petitioner must be frustrated by them. Ultimately, however, and with a heavy heart, I think that we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has no plan to develop a distinct digital connectivity plan for the Highlands and Islands. It will publish a new Highlands and Islands plan this year—any month now—that will integrate digital connectivity with other key priorities, and it will also publish a refreshed digital strategy that will take connectivity priorities into account.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maurice Golden
With regard to diversion from prosecution, what support is available under compulsory supervision orders? Are there sufficient resources across the whole of Scotland to provide that support?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maurice Golden
I might come back to you on that because, in setting the policy, you will still be required to know what happens on the other side, even though that is not what you are delivering.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Lord Advocate, it strikes me that the presumption against prosecution in these cases is perhaps out of kilter with public opinion. After all, the scope of what we are discussing is serious violent or sexual offences. My understanding of the whole-system approach is that it focuses on early interventions being made at the first sign of difficulty, and I think that there is a logic to that, but when it comes to the most serious cases of violence and sexual offending, the crisis point has probably been reached already and therefore any consideration that is given should happen in that context. What are your thoughts on that?
09:30