The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2315 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I think that colleagues will come in on that.
The commission is reporting surpluses of more than £1 million and reserves of £3.4 million. Is that unusual for a public body of that size? What will ultimately happen to that reserve? Where does it go?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Ultimately, it would be to the benefit of consumers of Scottish Water if that profit goes back.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I know that colleagues are waiting to come in on some of the other key issues in the report. Thank you for those answers.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Willie Coffey
On the retrospective approval email, I would think that, if you were seeking such approval, some alarm must have been raised for that to happen. However, nobody seemed to be aware of anything, and the audit and risk committee did not know about it. Who raised the alarm that led to a retrospective request being made?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Willie Coffey
So, nobody in the organisation was aware of the issue. It was your intervention that led to that. The organisation did not think to request it of its own volition.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, minister and colleagues. I have a couple of questions on the cladding assurance register, and one on issues that have been raised by the Law Society of Scotland.
Is it the Government’s intention that the cladding assurance register will be a one-off snapshot register and that it will not change, or do you plan to regularly update it when changes are made to buildings? If it is the latter, do we need a statutory process to make sure that only responsible persons can update the register? Could you describe the Government’s thinking on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
The Law Society also helpfully suggested that the Government might consider determining that some buildings fall outwith the scope of the SBA process and carry no risk whatever, because that would aid purchasers, mortgage lenders and so on in the buying and selling of some buildings. The society feels that if that does not happen, processes could be delayed for buildings that are essentially safe.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
It is good that that is being considered by the Government. We will have to deal with it in some way. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
My next question is on the cladding assurance register and the timing of entries being made. You are probably aware that colleagues have asked, in evidence, for that to be done as early as possible. When remediation works have been identified and planned for, could a building be put on the register to give owners, lenders, buyers and so on assurance that it is on the register? Would you support that, or would you insist on waiting for the work to be done before a building is put on the register?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
That was clear enough.
As you will probably have heard, the Law Society of Scotland raised a number of issues of clarity of definitions in the bill. It gave a number of examples in which it feels that there could be scope for misinterpretation. For example, it asked what the phrase “or otherwise undergone development” means, and highlighted other issues with regard to the definition of “risk”—in particular, the phrase “risk to human life”. It gave a host of examples of definitions that might lack a little clarity. Is the Government aware of that, and is it looking to try to define, sharpen up, polish or whatever, the bill’s terminology in order to assist everyone?