The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2315 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Willie Coffey
My question follows on from what you have just said, Eilidh. On the mechanism of applying the rent increases, as I understand it, if the proposed rent is less than the open market rent, the proposed rent will be, by and large, fine; if the proposed rent is more than the open market rate, the open market rate would apply. If the variation is 6 per cent or greater, a tapering process will apply. Is that too complicated? Will tenants understand that? Should we leave it to rent service Scotland to explain that, or is it the case that the basic principle is fair and effective and that the process represents a balanced approach?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I want to pick up on the issue of employers that habitually do not apply the Scottish tax code for their employees. In the NAO paper, we read that there were more than 37,000 such cases. We ask this question every year: why is there a recurring issue with employers failing to apply the correct tax code for their employees in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Is the money recoverable in relation to companies that should have applied the Scottish code? Is the tax ultimately recoverable when they correct the code for previous years?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I was going to ask whether the same employers are involved. For the fifth year, there seems to be the same number of cases—about 30,000. A member of the public would ask why that is the case. Is it the same employers making the mistakes? How many employers are we talking about? Is it a small number, or is it in the hundreds? Can you give the committee any further information to help us to understand the issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Willie Coffey
At a previous committee meeting, we asked for more information about the number of employers that habitually make such mistakes—we might even have asked for their names. Is it possible for the committee to get sight of that information?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Can you give the public some reassurance on the matter? Is the balance different each year, or are we dealing with the same offenders every year?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Despite some of the challenging messages from witnesses today, it is important to remember that, since 2007, Scotland has consistently built more social and affordable homes than any other part of the UK, and that it continues to do so. As an elected member for more years than I care to remember, I do not forget that we have lost 500,000 social rented homes in Scotland since 1979. You could argue about whether that has a legacy impact on our discussion today; I certainly think that its impact has been substantial. We reap what we sow, from those years to this day.
10:45I want to ask colleagues about the impact on homelessness services, a matter that has been raised a couple of times. I will ask Michael Cameron and Councillor Chalmers about this, in particular. What more do we need to do to—[Interruption.] I beg your pardon, Councillor Chalmers: I will speak closer to my microphone. I am asking you for your views on the impact and potential rise of homelessness. I think that you mentioned that a report is due from Heriot-Watt University suggesting that homelessness could increase by a third.
However, I will first ask Michael Cameron for his views, as the regulator has been giving us stark warnings about the impact of homelessness in the years to come, and about how we should try to build further protections into the housing to 2040 strategy.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Could you offer a perspective, Councillor Chalmers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Maureen, to come back on that—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Willie Coffey
In the past few weeks, the question of the numbers of landlord registrations has been asked and answered in the chamber. The figures that we have to date suggest that the numbers actually increased between August 2022 and November 2023. I know that that contradicts what John Mills said a moment ago, but once we see the figures, we will know the full picture.
However, we should not forget that the reason for the proposed measures is to try to prevent a situation in which people fall off a cliff edge into unaffordability, thereby creating more homelessness. The question is simple. Are the proposed limits—a lower limit of 6 per cent and an upper limit of 12 per cent—fair and reasonable? Do colleagues have a view as to whether those figures are fair and adequate?
Perhaps John Mills can go first.