The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2378 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I will follow that up briefly. Under the registration scheme, would it similarly be an offence to continue to operate if complaints about antisocial behaviour had been raised and proven to be correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Just to clarify, was the vote of no confidence letter the first time that ministers got wind of issues within the Crofting Commission or did the sponsor division alert them to the issues prior to that? Did you raise matters with the cabinet secretary before that letter was sent?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
When you look back, though, you see an original framework document that everybody at the time must have thought was fine, substantial, correct and proper. Nobody seemed to see us hurtling towards a section 22 report. That is what comes up again and again at this committee—initially, nobody noticed that things were going wrong or, if they did, they did not say anything. When were the issues that were developing brought to the attention of ministers, for example? Was it when the letter went to the cabinet secretary about the vote of no confidence? When did the Scottish ministers get notified that things were not quite as they should be?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
It still ended up in a section 22, though, did it not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Having listened to the discussion, I realise that I have been in this position many times in this committee. An organisation is not performing—let us say—at its best; the Auditor General and Audit Scotland intervene; new documents emerge; and everything seems fine from that point on. Why should we believe this time round that the experience that we are discussing today will lead to successful outcomes in future? What assurance can you offer the committee that errors have been corrected and that we can look forward to the future with confidence?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I have a final point on the Deloitte recommendations. Last week, we were told that the commission had completed 33 of the 41 recommendations, and I think that Roy Brannen said that it is now 34. Are you satisfied that those recommendations have been completed satisfactorily or are you just receiving reports that says that they have been? Have you looked at them in any depth?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2021
Willie Coffey
If the sponsor division knew that the relationships were not the best, why was the cabinet secretary not alerted before that letter?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I would like to clarify a point of law. If an unscrupulous operator of a short-term let has their licence withdrawn, would that make it a criminal offence for them to continue to operate? Similarly, if there was a registration scheme, would it be an offence for an unscrupulous operator to continue to operate if they were removed from the register? That question is for Chief Inspector Nicola Robison, or Andrew Mitchell might be able to answer it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I would like to ask the witnesses to give a brief response to my question. Our witnesses last week seemed to prefer a registration scheme to a licensing scheme. Which would you or your organisation prefer, and why? I ask Andrew Mitchell to start.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Thank you Ailsa. In the interests of time, convener, I hand back to you.