Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2378 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

It is difficult for us. In your response to Colin Beattie, you said that these were management failures, not workforce failures, but, with regard to the specification for the ship and the construction, surely the specifications were followed by the workforce. Where is that failure? Is it the management’s failure to give the workforce correct specifications?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Thanks very much. It sounds as though it is a little bit of both. My interpretation is that cables were short but equipment was in different places as well. Is that fair?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

To be totally clear, none of the observation reports is connected to specification changes—design changes or spec changes.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Overall, they do not give you cause for concern about further delay or further cost—they are a normal part of the construction process.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

It is getting there.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

You are saying that there were errors in the design and specification for these vessels and the workforce simply carried out the work as specified?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

I will turn to the thorny issue of the cables, which has come up several times in the committee. Paragraph 138 of the Auditor General’s report highlights:

“This process identified that some of the 1,400 cables that FMEL had installed at the end of 2018 were too short to reach required equipment.”

I put that point to Mr McColl last week, I think, and his response was that the specification changed constantly and equipment was moved around, making the cables shorter as a result. Could I ask for your view on that comment so that we can get that on the record?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

Can we just wait a minute until the helicopter passes over? [Interruption.]

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

On the broader issue of quality and quality standards, there is also commentary in the Auditor General’s report about there being little or no linkage to quality standards and no linkage between milestone events and quality checks. There is a comment that the quality was initially good but that, from October 2017-ish, he was beginning to highlight many quality issues, and those led to the owner observation reports, which were many and numerous. Can you say something about the application of quality standards and whether you considered it was correct, appropriate, fit for purpose and so on, or whether it was not?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Willie Coffey

In any process of constructing anything, you are bound to get comments and requests for change—specification changes, perhaps—as you go along. Is that natural in the process?