Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2155 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2020/21”

Meeting date: 12 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Is it too early to say anything about the possible impact of the various support schemes on your forecasts?

Public Audit Committee

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2020/21”

Meeting date: 12 May 2022

Willie Coffey

I would be obliged if you could submit that to the committee.

11:00  

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of South Lanarkshire College”

Meeting date: 12 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, Auditor General. I want to drill down a wee bit into the non-compliance issues that you raised. I realise that you might be limited in what you can tell us; nevertheless, we have to try to get to the bottom of it.

Your report and comments have told us that the audit and risk committee and the board suddenly stopped meeting around May or June 2021, and that there were no more formal meetings of either body. What explanation has been given for that? The staff and the wider student body must surely have been aware of that and asked questions about it. Were any explanations given to anyone about why they suddenly stopped meeting?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 10 May 2022

Willie Coffey

That is interesting. However, if a seller chose to contest that valuation, its defender would surely point to the certification process, which is non-statutory, to justify it.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 10 May 2022

Willie Coffey

I thank everyone for their answers, which have also covered my question on the building assessment programme.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 10 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Marie McNair talked about zero-valued homes and EWS1 certification. My question is for Craig Ross and Laura Hughes, who represent surveyors and insurers, respectively. Is there a legal issue if a certification scheme that has no statutory basis—and which my notes say creates particular issues in the context of Scots property law—is used to tell a homeowner that their property is valued at £0? Does hanging that value on a non-statutory process create a legal issue?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 10 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Laura Hughes, can you add to our understanding of the issue?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 10 May 2022

Willie Coffey

There remains the issue that Chris Ashurst perfectly described of people having their homes valued at £0 because of a process. What is your view on that, Chris? How can people find themselves in those circumstances because of a process that is not statutory?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 28 April 2022

Willie Coffey

I will ask about the general application of quality standards. That is a recurring theme, as we all know, but in this case, they apply to the shipbuilding industry. Over many years, the committee has heard about the importance of thorough planning and design at the outset of any project, whether it be a piece of software, a bridge or vessels, as in this case.

On page 25 is your report, you say that Ferguson started building the vessels before the designs were agreed with CMAL, which led to substantial reworking being required, with

“increased costs and delays”

and

“no link to quality standards.”

Those are the words in your report.

Why was that allowed to happen at the outset? Surely nobody would start building something before they knew what they were being asked to build. Do such failures mean that there was little prospect of a successful construction outcome further down the line?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS Highland”

Meeting date: 28 April 2022

Willie Coffey

Thanks very much, convener, and madainn mhath to the panel from NHS Highland. I start by reminding everyone that when a health board comes before the Public Audit Committee it is usually because of Audit Scotland knocking on the door and this Scottish Parliament committee having a look at matters.

To your great credit, you appear to have turned your finances around. However, my question is, how can there be such a transformation on finances with no impact on healthcare, or the public’s perception of it, in NHS Highland? You said that nothing of significant concern resulted from that. If you do not mind, please tell us how that can be.