The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Is it too early to say anything about the possible impact of the various support schemes on your forecasts?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I would be obliged if you could submit that to the committee.
11:00Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Auditor General. I want to drill down a wee bit into the non-compliance issues that you raised. I realise that you might be limited in what you can tell us; nevertheless, we have to try to get to the bottom of it.
Your report and comments have told us that the audit and risk committee and the board suddenly stopped meeting around May or June 2021, and that there were no more formal meetings of either body. What explanation has been given for that? The staff and the wider student body must surely have been aware of that and asked questions about it. Were any explanations given to anyone about why they suddenly stopped meeting?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Willie Coffey
That is interesting. However, if a seller chose to contest that valuation, its defender would surely point to the certification process, which is non-statutory, to justify it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I thank everyone for their answers, which have also covered my question on the building assessment programme.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Marie McNair talked about zero-valued homes and EWS1 certification. My question is for Craig Ross and Laura Hughes, who represent surveyors and insurers, respectively. Is there a legal issue if a certification scheme that has no statutory basis—and which my notes say creates particular issues in the context of Scots property law—is used to tell a homeowner that their property is valued at £0? Does hanging that value on a non-statutory process create a legal issue?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Laura Hughes, can you add to our understanding of the issue?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Willie Coffey
There remains the issue that Chris Ashurst perfectly described of people having their homes valued at £0 because of a process. What is your view on that, Chris? How can people find themselves in those circumstances because of a process that is not statutory?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Willie Coffey
I will ask about the general application of quality standards. That is a recurring theme, as we all know, but in this case, they apply to the shipbuilding industry. Over many years, the committee has heard about the importance of thorough planning and design at the outset of any project, whether it be a piece of software, a bridge or vessels, as in this case.
On page 25 is your report, you say that Ferguson started building the vessels before the designs were agreed with CMAL, which led to substantial reworking being required, with
“increased costs and delays”
and
“no link to quality standards.”
Those are the words in your report.
Why was that allowed to happen at the outset? Surely nobody would start building something before they knew what they were being asked to build. Do such failures mean that there was little prospect of a successful construction outcome further down the line?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much, convener, and madainn mhath to the panel from NHS Highland. I start by reminding everyone that when a health board comes before the Public Audit Committee it is usually because of Audit Scotland knocking on the door and this Scottish Parliament committee having a look at matters.
To your great credit, you appear to have turned your finances around. However, my question is, how can there be such a transformation on finances with no impact on healthcare, or the public’s perception of it, in NHS Highland? You said that nothing of significant concern resulted from that. If you do not mind, please tell us how that can be.