The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
It is a recurring issue that, when the committee considers any project, it often finds that, if the project goes wrong at the beginning, it is unlikely to work at the end, as insufficient rigour was applied at the outset. Not applying quality standards to milestones seems to committee members to be a major issue.
Paragraph 138 of the Auditor General’s report told us that
“some of the 1,400 cables”
installed on the first boat
“were too short”.
It is amazing to members of the committee and, perhaps, the public that that was not discovered and not reported to the Parliament until the turnaround director was involved in 2022. How on earth can something like that happen? How can cables that are too short go unseen and unnoticed for nearly four years and cause a significant delay? I connect that directly with the application of quality standards and inspection. Why was that missing in this case?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Should it not? It is ridiculous to be unable to challenge the fact that cables are too short on a boat and for that to remain the position for four years until somebody else—the turnaround director—comes on the scene to identify it. Surely, we must be considering that. I am aware that the observation reports were a mechanism to raise and highlight issues. In essence, they are change requests in the quality world, and the builder might or might not have carried them out. Surely to goodness that needs to be strengthened.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a supplementary question on the convener’s line of questioning, Mr Brannen. Is the extent to which some parties are placing an emphasis on paper trails and the recording of decisions a fair reflection of how the Government works in practice? Are we dealing with the unmet expectations of some people or with failures to deliver on requirements? Which side of that line are we on? The issue has been a recurring one for the committee, and others, for some time.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Do all parties accept the point that the Auditor General made about the cables being too short, or is there some dispute about that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a supplementary to my colleague, Craig Hoy’s, question.
Mr Brannen, you have heard the convener raising issues about the decision-making process and record keeping. You have also heard Craig Hoy highlighting proper consideration of risk, which is central to some of the issues that we are facing. In your view, were the issues that have been raised about those two areas sufficient to have invited the Government to reach a different decision about procurement of the vessels?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Had the Government not proceeded with the procurement of the vessels, what would have been the impact and outcome?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Did even the builder accept that they were too short?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I do not know who sets the criteria that assessors use. Are market conditions part of their consideration? If not, should they be? You can imagine a situation in which rateable values go up and up but a lot of shops on all our high streets might remain closed. It does not seem to make sense that the RV would increase if local economic circumstances pointed us in a different direction.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Willie Coffey
I want to ask about the wider issues that apply and the criteria that assessors use to set rateable values. You have clearly explained that assessors will provide a set of equivalent or adjacent addresses on which the assessment was based. Are current economic circumstances ever a factor in the equation? You can imagine a scenario in which adjacent shops are shut. In that case, why should a rateable value go up, and how does that represent market value, as opposed to there being an assessment of the practical circumstances that are evident in a local economy?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks for that.