Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 13 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2447 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

I find that very helpful, because the second aspect that you mentioned is an issue with reporting more generally. For example, we inspect and audit care homes, but we do not necessarily monitor the individual’s journey through their experience of social care and into a care home. That is exactly the same issue that you are describing in relation to adult disability payments. That helps me to understand how we could do better than that.

However, how we can monitor or measure fairness, dignity and respect is a little more challenging. Is how a person feels that they have been treated not, by definition, subjective? I take on board the recommendation, but how that could be measured in an objective way?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

So, we should try to find a way of doing it, but it is challenging.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

That sounds absolutely fair. It is up to the Government to respond and work out how we would do that.

Do you want to come back in on that, Mr Boyle?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you. I call Carol Mochan.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you, Stephen. I apologise to committee members for taking up a chunk of airtime, but I thought that it was important, given what we have coming down the line. Alexander Stewart is next.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

That concludes our evidence session. Stephen Boyle and Erin McGinley, I thank you for your support in helping us to understand the report. I ask you to stay seated for a brief moment, to allow me to sneakily move on to agenda item 3 without suspending proceedings.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you for those opening comments, which will give an important context to our scrutiny session. The first question will come from Jeremy Balfour.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

Before I bring in my colleague Carol Mochan, which I will do shortly, I put on the record that the social security independent advocacy service is to be provided by Advice Direct Scotland. That is now public information, and the committee will hear from Advice Direct Scotland on 11 December, when there will be more opportunities to explore that.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

Thanks, Marie. It is a really good line of questioning. We are always under time constraints on a Thursday morning, and I am sorry about that. I want to sneak in a brief question, then Jeremy Balfour wants to come back in.

Elena Whitham raised the issue of how we get to the report’s more personalised and holistic approach for assessments, and Carol Mochan talked about the inconsistencies in decisions. There is a tension between those things; doing one might exacerbate the other. I apologise for a really bad comparison, but I have sat on job interview panels, using points-based systems. You look at competencies and you do a total at the end, but the person who gets the job is not always the person who gets the highest total of points, because you look at things in the round. You look at the points total, which is how you get to your short leet, then you take a step back and look at the overall package that a person might bring to the post. I am sorry for that dreadful comparison, but we have, almost, a cliff-edge system.

The report said that we should stick with the points-based system, despite all its failings, because it is important to provide certainty. However, should there be a degree of discretion whereby an assessor can take a step back and say, “This person is one point short of qualifying, but, if we look holistically at them, they probably should qualify”? Is there a way of mixing the points system with a more holistic approach?

09:45  

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Adult Disability Payment

Meeting date: 27 November 2025

Bob Doris

That is very helpful—thank you.