The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2295 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Katy Clark, do you have any more questions?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Time is almost upon us. I forgot to say this to the first panel, but if there is anything burning within you that you feel you have to get into the Official Report before I close this evidence session, you now have the opportunity to raise it now—as long as it is brief, of course.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
I am pleased that I nudged you, because I have inspired Mike Corbett to come in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Katy Clark, do you want to follow up on any of that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Anna Ritchie Allan, you have come back to the theme of the glacial pace of progress for female workers time and time again. Is there anything that SEIAC could do to speed up the pace of that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Paul O’Kane, this is your line of questioning. Do you want to follow up on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
Do you want to say any more about that, Mr Tasker? I am not remotely trying to be awkward, but the member in charge of the bill, Mr Griffin, will give evidence to the committee and say why he has opted for that number. You have had a discussion with Mr Griffin, and you think that the number is about right. What persuaded you of that? We will need to ask Mr Griffin the same question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
I will bring in John Mason, who is going to look at finances. However, I am conscious that that is the last line of questioning, so, before I do so, I will put a broader question to the panel.
As is self-evident, the bill will either pass or it will not. Nevertheless, are there certain things that the bill would achieve that must happen, irrespective of whether it is passed? For example, whether or not the bill is passed, the research must still happen, and the criteria for getting on the list must be reviewed appropriately with regard to gender.
Perhaps each of you could comment from your own perspective. It is an opportunity for you to say something about what must happen in relation to industrial injuries and making sure that people are properly compensated. This is a good time to do it, because I am conscious that, once we get on to talking about the finances—we have to scrutinise robustly the finances underpinning the legislation—that takes us down a different avenue.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
That is helpful. Are there any other comments?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Bob Doris
I will mop up a couple of aspects. Clearly, a proactive approach to health and safety at work is desirable for everyone. Workers and trade unions on the ground see in real time exactly what is happening. They absolutely have that lived experience. Should SEIAC identify gaps in employment law and health and safety legislation while employment law and health and safety legislation are not devolved to Scotland? Should it have the power to make recommendations to the UK Government, with which the powers currently sit?
Linda, you have put on record that you would like some of that to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament. However, in lieu of that, in the meantime, should any new body make direct recommendations to the UK Government?