The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to welcome that the Scottish Government intends to rectify the error at the earliest opportunity, which is anticipated to be in the autumn of this year?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The Scottish Government confirmed that the explanatory note is incorrect in suggesting that the instrument affords immunities and benefits only to officers who have British nationality. It advised that it intends to correct the text of the explanatory note.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in respect of the error in the explanatory note?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
In relation to the information gathering powers for the Accountant of Court in section 39, there is an exception to the requirement to comply. That is for United Kingdom Government ministers and departments and bodies exercising reserved functions, such as His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. We have had evidence on that before. They can choose whether to comply.
It may be the case that a section 104 order is, ultimately, required to extend the full scope of the information gathering powers to UK Government ministers, departments and bodies, but we cannot yet be sure that that will happen. If that issue does not get addressed via a section 104 order, does what we have in the bill present any problems for the Accountant of Court? If so, how significant are those potential problems?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful, thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
That is something that has come up in previous SLC bills. Committee members know about the section 104 order and have discussed and debated it a lot in recent years. The one challenge with the section 104 order is the length of time that it would take for the process and for it to be agreed. In one example, it was estimated that that would take about a year and a half. That was in relation to the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Bill, which is now the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Act 2024.
There could be a situation where some aspects are still operating under the old law and other aspects are operating under the law that we passed in December. Would that provide any complications for you if that type of situation were to play out?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Would it be fair to say that, if the legislation passes through the process, there will be a role for the Scottish Government to engage with associations that will have operations elsewhere in the UK as well as, potentially, their international counterparts?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I have a final question on that subject. For talking’s sake, if multiple firms offered to assist in a situation akin to the one that you described, how would you decide which firm or firms should get the work? If two firms suggested that they could take the work on wills, what criteria would the Law Society use to decide whether to give the work to firm A or firm B?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Does either of the other witnesses want to come in on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you. I know that Foysol Choudhury had indicated that he wanted to come in, but I think that his area of questioning has already been covered.
We have no further questions, so I invite our witnesses to make any points that have not been covered so far.
As no one wishes to make any further points, I thank our witnesses for coming to today’s meeting. If any more points occur to anyone after today’s meeting, they can make the committee aware of them in writing.
11:55 Meeting suspended.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 3 is consideration of an instrument that is subject to affirmative procedure. No points have been raised on the instrument. Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.