The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
In response to the committee’s call for views, the Faculty of Procurators of Caithness said:
“There should be a specific provision for an interested party to raise concerns about the Judicial Factors administration of the estate.”
It proposed that
“in the first instance this should be with the Accountant of Court”
and that if the interested person or organisation were unsatisfied with the outcome, there would then be a role for the court. When the Scottish Law Commission appeared before the committee last week, it was decidedly unsure about the policy merits of that idea. What do witnesses think of that proposal? Can you identify any benefits of or drawbacks to that suggestion?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Before we move on, is it common for judicial factories to be cross-border, both within the UK and further afield? Have you come across that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We also received evidence from the Faculty of Procurators of Caithness. In its submission, it states:
“We are firmly of the view that whatever other provisions may be made, the Judicial Factor should be wholly independent of the Law Society of Scotland, and there should be explicit prohibition of any current officer or employee of the Law Society of Scotland being appointed as the Judicial Factor”.
Do you agree with that suggestion?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We move on to section 4 of the bill, under which the main qualification that is required for appointment as a judicial factor is that the court considers a person “suitable” for that role. In response to the committee’s call for views, some respondents, such as Missing People, supported that approach. Others wanted the bill to be more prescriptive. Propertymark, for example, wanted professional qualifications to be specified. Did the commission consider an approach that would involve specifying in statute that professional qualifications would be required for some circumstances in which judicial factors were appointed, but not others?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I have one final question in this area. I assume that you are aware of the situation that arose with McClure Solicitors.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Before we move on, and I hesitate to ask this question, but, particularly in respect of that area, would a section 104 order be made use of?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I have a final question on that, out of interest. That one example, at 25 years, is a long period of time. I do not think that anyone would have anticipated that length of time. Do you have any figures to hand on the average length of time that a judicial factory would be in place?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
That would be very helpful, and we could consider that further. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, and welcome to the 12th meeting in 2024 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We have received apologies from Tim Eagle MSP. In his place, I welcome Alexander Stewart MSP.
I remind everyone to switch off or silence their mobile phones and other electronic devices, please.
The first item of business is a declaration of interests. In accordance with section 3 of the “Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament”, I invite Alexander Stewart to declare any interests that are relevant to the committee’s remit.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The next item of business is to decide whether to take items 7 and 8 in private. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.