The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 4 is consideration of two instruments that are subject to negative procedure. No points have been raised on the instruments. Is the committee content with the instruments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 13th meeting in 2024 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to please switch off or silence their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
Under agenda item 1, is the committee content to take items 5, 6 and 7 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we will take evidence on the Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. I welcome our first panel. Morna Grandison is director of interventions at the Law Society of Scotland, Gavin MacColl KC is from the Faculty of Advocates, Dr Alisdair MacPherson is senior lecturer in commercial law at the University of Aberdeen, and Professor Gareth Morgan is from the Charity Law Association.
Thank you for joining us. I remind you not to worry about turning on the microphones, as that will be done automatically for you. When you would like to comment in response to a question, please raise your hand or indicate to the clerks. There is no need to answer every question; you can simply indicate that a question is not for you to respond to. However, please feel free to follow up on any question in writing after the meeting, if you wish.
Before we get into the specifics, will you tell us briefly and in general terms what you think about the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We should also bear in mind that a small number of individuals will be practising this, and they will be expert in this particular area of law.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Does anyone else want to come in on this?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you very much for that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I did not think that you would, but I thought that I would give you the opportunity.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We could raise that point with the lead committee.
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you. Bill Kidd has the next question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you for that. I appreciate the challenge that you have in dealing with the firm, but what you have said is now on the record.
I have been approached by many solicitors from across the country who have expressed their concern and anger at what has happened, because they feel that it has had an adverse effect on the wider sector. Clearly, fees will go up in order to pay for what has happened, but there is also a feeling that the Law Society has not fully explained the process as to why a judicial factor was not appointed at that particular point. However, what you have said is on the record and might or might not appease some of the folk who have expressed their concerns and thoughts to me.
Going back to the 1980 act, the Law Society of Scotland said in its response to both the 2019 Scottish Government consultation and the committee’s call for views that it would like additional powers to deal with “incorporated practices”, and that those powers could be achieved by way of an amendment to the bill. For the benefit of the record, what is the issue arising here, and what powers would the Law Society of Scotland like in order to address it?