The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering five instruments. An issue has been raised on the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The instrument amends the privileges and immunities afforded to the European Space Agency, the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, and their representatives and staff.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried discrepancies between the instrument and the explanatory note.
The Scottish Government acknowledged that the new paragraph 7 of schedule 15 to the order that is being amended—the International Organisations (Immunities and Privileges) (Scotland) Order 2009—does not operate as the policy intended. It confirmed that it intends to rectify the error at the earliest opportunity.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (i)—defective drafting—on the basis that the paragraph does not operate as intended, in that a director general, or a person acting in their place, who has a form of British nationality does not benefit from exemptions relating to social security as was intended?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I see that there are no further questions from colleagues.
The panel has been asked a variety of questions, but are there any points that have not been touched on but which the panellists would like to put on the record?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 4, we are considering two instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Will the bill aid the work that you do if there are cross-border issues? I know that that is a difficult question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
For our second panel today, I welcome Morna Grandison, director of interventions, Law Society of Scotland; Sandy Lamb, partner, Lindsays; and Ken Pattullo, partner, Begbies Traynor.
I remind the panellists not to worry about turning on the microphones, as they will be turned on automatically. If you would like to come in on any questions, please raise your hand or catch the eye of the clerks. There is no need to answer every question—you can simply indicate that it is not for you. However, if you want to follow up in writing afterwards, please do so.
Before we move to questions from the committee, I want, first of all, to thank you for agreeing to appear before us today. It is helpful for the committee to get the views of those practising as judicial factors.
For the benefit of the committee, can you describe the type or types of judicial factories that you are currently, and have been, involved in? Specifically, what are the general purposes of your appointment? For how long have you been, and do you usually find yourself, in post? How did you initially come to be appointed as a judicial factor by the court?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Morna Grandison, do you have anything to add?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We move on to a question that is really for Morna. The witnesses will be aware of the situation with McClure Solicitors, which ceased trading in 2021, when Jones Whyte was appointed to take over a substantial volume of case work on trusts, executories and powers of attorney. If the McClure case had been suitable for the appointment of a judicial factor, the committee is interested to know how that would have operated in practice, given the scale and nature of the case load that McClure Solicitors had. To give you some indication of that, it was estimated that there were more than 60,000 wills, 20,000 powers of attorney and about 18,500 trusts.
Who would have assumed responsibility for the on-going work required for existing cases in areas such as trusts and executories when it is presumably challenging for an in-house judicial factor to have expertise in all the specialist areas of legal practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Would it be quite common to divide up the existing business to regulated firms?