Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2221 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

I did not say that I agree with it. I just thought that I would pose the question; that is what we are here to do.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

The committee asked two questions on this instrument, which, from 1 August 2025, amends the eligibility criteria for membership of the Scottish teachers’ pension scheme by amending the principal regulations for the scheme—the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) (No 2) Regulations 2014 (SSI 2014/292).

The first question was whether it had been intentional to include a definition of “immediately before” in schedule 1, thus suggesting that the definition applies in each place where it appears, including references in both the new provisions that are inserted by this instrument and existing provisions. The Scottish Government confirmed that the intention had been for the definition to apply only to the new provisions. However, it considers that, in the context of the other 13 provisions, the new definition is inoperative and therefore of no effect.

The second question relates to proposed new paragraph 16(1)(d) of schedule 1 to the principal regulations, as inserted by regulation 4(c) of these amendment regulations. The committee asked the Scottish Government what the words

“this part of the scheme”

meant in the paragraph, and whether its meaning was sufficiently clear. The Scottish Government confirmed that the paragraph is meant to have effect in relation to the scheme as a whole, as established by the principal regulations, and the unintentional ambiguity is regretted. The Scottish Government intends to clarify both issues in the next amending instrument.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in that the definition of “immediately before”, as inserted into schedule 1 of SSI 2014/292 by regulation 3 of the instrument, was intended to apply in relation to that term only where it appears in proposed new paragraphs 15B, 15C and 15D, but has been applied to all instances where that term appears in schedule 1; and that the reference to

“this part of the scheme”

in proposed new paragraph 16(1)(d) to schedule 1 of SSI 2014/292, as inserted by regulation 4(c) of the instrument, should be a reference to the scheme as a whole? Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government has undertaken to clarify those points in the next amending instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following instrument.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

I just want to echo the comments of the deputy convener, and note that bullet point 2 in paragraph 20 of the report says:

“Overall positivity about the Bank increased from 68 per cent to 83 per cent.”

Furthermore, paragraph 27 says that the bank

“demonstrates a culture of continuous improvement”;

paragraph 72 talks about its “sound oversight arrangements”; paragraph 89 mentions

“improvements in ... content and presentation”;

and there are other paragraphs in the report that say that the organisation appears to be doing well on governance.

I come back to a point made by my colleague Colin Beattie. I note that paragraphs 21 and 47 are about the issue of risk, and it strikes me that the organisation is very cautious, notwithstanding the financial straitjacket that it has to work within. It appears that it is focused on risk, that it is trying to provide certainty for business investment and that it is not prepared to go out on a limb. Is that an accurate assessment?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

That is helpful. Obviously, that is a recommendation in the report, but has the point been put to SNIB in discussions between you and its representatives? If so, has it been receptive to it?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

You have already touched on exhibit 4, on page 25, which outlines the process for the bank’s investment decisions. Those are taken without the Scottish Government’s involvement. How robust are the safeguards that are in place to maintain independence?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

In exhibit 7, on page 33, 27 local authority areas are covered, and five are not. Which are those five?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Do you have any indication as to why it took a fairly lengthy period of time before the group met?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

The target rate of return is between 3 and 4 per cent across the bank’s portfolio. Can you provide further information on the mechanism for that and how it will be measured and reported on?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Scottish National Investment Bank”

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

When it comes to comparisons internationally and within the UK—with, for example, the British Business Bank—how is the bank faring? Is it too early to say?