The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
I did not say that I agree with it. I just thought that I would pose the question; that is what we are here to do.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The committee asked two questions on this instrument, which, from 1 August 2025, amends the eligibility criteria for membership of the Scottish teachers’ pension scheme by amending the principal regulations for the scheme—the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) (No 2) Regulations 2014 (SSI 2014/292).
The first question was whether it had been intentional to include a definition of “immediately before” in schedule 1, thus suggesting that the definition applies in each place where it appears, including references in both the new provisions that are inserted by this instrument and existing provisions. The Scottish Government confirmed that the intention had been for the definition to apply only to the new provisions. However, it considers that, in the context of the other 13 provisions, the new definition is inoperative and therefore of no effect.
The second question relates to proposed new paragraph 16(1)(d) of schedule 1 to the principal regulations, as inserted by regulation 4(c) of these amendment regulations. The committee asked the Scottish Government what the words
“this part of the scheme”
meant in the paragraph, and whether its meaning was sufficiently clear. The Scottish Government confirmed that the paragraph is meant to have effect in relation to the scheme as a whole, as established by the principal regulations, and the unintentional ambiguity is regretted. The Scottish Government intends to clarify both issues in the next amending instrument.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in that the definition of “immediately before”, as inserted into schedule 1 of SSI 2014/292 by regulation 3 of the instrument, was intended to apply in relation to that term only where it appears in proposed new paragraphs 15B, 15C and 15D, but has been applied to all instances where that term appears in schedule 1; and that the reference to
“this part of the scheme”
in proposed new paragraph 16(1)(d) to schedule 1 of SSI 2014/292, as inserted by regulation 4(c) of the instrument, should be a reference to the scheme as a whole? Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government has undertaken to clarify those points in the next amending instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following instrument.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
I just want to echo the comments of the deputy convener, and note that bullet point 2 in paragraph 20 of the report says:
“Overall positivity about the Bank increased from 68 per cent to 83 per cent.”
Furthermore, paragraph 27 says that the bank
“demonstrates a culture of continuous improvement”;
paragraph 72 talks about its “sound oversight arrangements”; paragraph 89 mentions
“improvements in ... content and presentation”;
and there are other paragraphs in the report that say that the organisation appears to be doing well on governance.
I come back to a point made by my colleague Colin Beattie. I note that paragraphs 21 and 47 are about the issue of risk, and it strikes me that the organisation is very cautious, notwithstanding the financial straitjacket that it has to work within. It appears that it is focused on risk, that it is trying to provide certainty for business investment and that it is not prepared to go out on a limb. Is that an accurate assessment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful. Obviously, that is a recommendation in the report, but has the point been put to SNIB in discussions between you and its representatives? If so, has it been receptive to it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
You have already touched on exhibit 4, on page 25, which outlines the process for the bank’s investment decisions. Those are taken without the Scottish Government’s involvement. How robust are the safeguards that are in place to maintain independence?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In exhibit 7, on page 33, 27 local authority areas are covered, and five are not. Which are those five?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Do you have any indication as to why it took a fairly lengthy period of time before the group met?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
The target rate of return is between 3 and 4 per cent across the bank’s portfolio. Can you provide further information on the mechanism for that and how it will be measured and reported on?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
When it comes to comparisons internationally and within the UK—with, for example, the British Business Bank—how is the bank faring? Is it too early to say?