The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 110 contributions
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
This might be a leading question, but it is not meant to be. Would it be useful for the Government consider that aspect, as it is looking at the guidance in relation to hyperscale data centres, which it is going to publish before the end of the year?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Does the climate narrative provide an accessible introduction to the budget for stakeholders and, more crucially, the wider public?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting of the Climate Action Committee in session 7. We have received apologies from Ariane Burgess MSP.
The first item of business is a decision on taking items 3 and 4 in private. Item 3 is consideration of the evidence heard under item 2, and item 4 is consideration of the committee’s approach to its inquiry into the environmental impacts of hyperscale data centres. Do members agree to take items 3 and 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 2 is the second of two evidence sessions on pre-budget scrutiny for 2027-28. I welcome Josiah Lockhart, the chief executive officer of Changeworks and a member of the Climate Emergency Response Group, and Lewis Barlow, the decarbonisation head of profession at WSP. Good morning, gentlemen, and thank you for coming.
We will move straight to questions, and then we will see how things pan out. How well have the joint budget review strands been implemented so far?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring in Sanne Dijkstra-Downie, I have a quick question on the point that you touched on, Mr Lockhart. Is there a possibility of double accounting? If we bring in a product—whether it is concrete, bricks or whatever—to be used here, that is counted in our taxonomy. If the country that we bought it from has a similar process, would it be counted in its system, too?
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
That was helpful. David Barratt has a supplementary.
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
At the bottom of page 3 of the CERG briefing paper, it is stated:
“Lessons can be learned from other jurisdictions (e.g. New Zealand, Australia) who are already leading the way on policy appraisal and WLC assessment of infrastructure projects.”
What gaps have you found where those countries are doing things that we are not? I go back to the comment from Mr Barlow a moment ago, that we seem to be leading the way on some aspects, although that was in reference to net zero assessments. It goes back to the point that I touched on earlier, that some of this is quite complicated and we are trying to make it accessible for the wider public.
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Sanne Dijkstra-Downie has a supplementary question.
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
Martyn Day wants to ask a quick supplementary question.
Climate Action Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2026
Stuart McMillan
You have mentioned the city deals and growth deals, and those are also referenced in the CERG report. Was any work undertaken retrospectively to use past projects to give a full understanding of how the process will work with activity going forward?