The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is certainly something that would be worth while to look at if you could send that to the committee—thank you.
Paragraphs 32 to 37 of your report cover the complex issues that relate to the qualified opinion on the college’s accounts. Can you provide further detail on the key stakeholders that the college reported those issues to?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Can you provide further detail on the three recommendations from the lessons learned report that are being implemented on an on-going basis? What progress is being made?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful—thank you.
Paragraph 39 of the report states:
“The annual audit report 2022/23 concluded that, with the exception of the issues related to the project, Forth Valley College has effective arrangements in place for financial planning, governance and performance management.”
That sounds a wee bit contradictory—it certainly contradicts what we have heard this morning. How can the arrangements that were in place at the time have been effective if they enabled the situation that has arisen?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
In December 2024, the board of management agreed that the dual role held by the vice-principal of finance and corporate affairs as secretary to the board of management should continue, despite the board acknowledging that the arrangement does not comply with the “Code of Good Governance for Scotland’s Colleges”. Do you know why the board of management took that decision?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The purpose of this instrument is to change employee contribution rates by amending the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Regulations 2015 (SSI 2015/19). The committee asked whether the title of the instrument should in fact be the “Firefighters Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025”. The Scottish Government agreed that that would be the more appropriate title. It regretted the departure from drafting convention but considered that the meaning, understanding or effect of the instrument would not be affected by the form of the title in this case.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, in respect of the fact that its title is not in line with drafting convention?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee also wish to note that the Scottish Government intends to correct a minor cross-referencing error identified by the committee as soon as possible, through a correction slip?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 4 is an evidence-taking session with Graham Simpson MSP, the member in charge of the Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill. He is accompanied by?Catriona Lyle, a solicitor from legal services at the Scottish Parliament. I welcome you both to the meeting and, indeed, welcome Mr Simpson back to the committee, even for just a short time, as he convened the committee in the last parliamentary session.
I remind you both that you do not have to press any buttons, as that will be done for you. We will move to questions.
It is quite rare to see an express power to legislatively sub-delegate in a bill. The committee is keenly interested in that, as it has the potential to erode democratic accountability. It is one thing to give Scottish ministers the power to make regulations, but it is another to give Scottish ministers the power to award that power to a third party.
With that in mind, it would be helpful if you could provide the committee with further context to that proposal in the bill. Is there a precedent that served as a model for section 21 of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
No problem.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
As there are no further questions, I thank Mr Simpson and Ms Lyle for their evidence this morning. The committee might follow-up in writing if additional questions stem from this morning’s session. Thank you once again.
That concludes the public part of the meeting.
10:29 Meeting continued in private until 11:06.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering four instruments. Points have been raised on three of them. The committee asked questions of the Scottish Government in relation to all four instruments, and the full correspondence has been published alongside the papers for this meeting.