Chamber and committees

Is the committee content with the instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

The instrument temporarily permits the use of an alternative and quicker rabies antibody titration test. The instrument was made on 8 April 2022 and came into force the following day. It therefore breaches the 28-day rule in section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010.

In correspondence with the Presiding Officer, the Scottish Government explained that a breach of the laying requirements was necessary, as urgent action was needed to relieve the current pressures on quarantine facilities as a result of the high volume of pets entering the United Kingdom from Ukraine.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (j), for failure to comply with laying requirements?

Members indicated agreement.

Does the committee wish to write to the Scottish Government to invite it to consider legislating to make it easier for the user to understand the provisions of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014, which apply differently in relation to direct payment support and to agricultural support?

Members indicated agreement.

The instrument makes temporary modifications, until 31 October, to existing regulations to ensure that healthcare professionals who have recently retired can return to work, and that those who have already returned can increase their hours without there being a negative impact on their pension entitlements. The instrument also amends existing pensions regulations to insert new tables reflecting revised employee contribution rates from 1 April 2022.

In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee highlighted that regulation 1(3) provides that regulations 2 to 5 come into force immediately after the expiry of section 46 of the Coronavirus Act 2020. Section 46 expired at the end of 24 March 2022, which is before the instrument was made at 10.13 am the following day.

In response, the Scottish Government explained that it was intended that regulations 2 to 5 would have retrospective effect, and it was regrettable that the provision could be read instead as coming into force at the relevant date. In line with proper drafting practice, the instrument should have been made and then come into force, with separate provision made regarding retrospective effect.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the Parliament’s attention on the general reporting ground, for a failure to follow proper drafting practice, as provision should have been made for regulations 2 to 5 to have retrospective effect rather than coming into force prior to the instrument being made?

Members indicated agreement.

Is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

The instrument is made in an area formerly governed by European Union law. The purpose of the instrument is to remove certain provisions of the common agricultural policy in retained EU law that are considered no longer appropriate or workable for Scotland, and to make changes to the inspection requirements for rural support schemes, including in light of the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic.

In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee identified difficulties that arise from there being parallel texts, or parallel versions, of some of the legislation that is being amended. The situation has arisen because the legislation that is being amended was brought over from EU law into domestic law early, on 31 January 2020, as it applies to direct payment support, and the same legislation was then brought over later, on 31 December 2020, as it applies to agricultural support.

Between those two dates, the legislation was amended as it applies to direct payments, which has resulted in some of the provisions saying different things in relation to direct payments and to agricultural support respectively. In particular, the committee identified that it could be clearer what the effect is of the substitution that is made by regulation 3(2) on the version of article 24(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 as it applies to direct payment support, and the version as it applies to agricultural support. The Scottish Government acknowledged in its response, which can be read online in paper 2, that the background to the legislation that is currently being amended creates an extremely complex position for the user of the legislation.

In its correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee also asked whether the title of the Commission implementing regulation that is being amended is missing in regulation 3(1), which gives the number but not the name. The Scottish Government agreed that the full title is missing and proposes to include a provision in a future Scottish statutory instrument to insert the missing part of the title.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h), in that the meaning could be clearer, in so far as the effect of the substitution made by regulation 3(2) could be clearer?

Members indicated agreement.

At the same time, is the committee content with the explanation that the Scottish Government has provided for the breach of the laying requirements?

Members indicated agreement.

I believe that Mr Simpson wants to highlight something.

That is a fair point, Mr Simpson. We can certainly contact the lead committee with the points that you raise.

Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following two instruments.

Is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.