The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2097 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering an instrument on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 4, we are considering an instrument on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring in the other witnesses, I will make a point regarding your first category. Certainly, it could be quite time consuming to pull something together in order to bring in emergency legislation. On the issue of capacity, which was raised earlier, as I asked Sir Jonathan, does the civil service actually have the capacity to look at all the legislation that is currently there? Dr Tucker indicated that officials would have to engage with all the legislation that is there. Given the short time that we have, there is a possibility that not every piece of legislation will be engaged with in order to make an active decision before a sunsetting happens or does not happen on each particular piece of legislation. I suggest that, given the capacity issue and the short timescale—notwithstanding the potential to extend the sunsetting—litigation could be a regular occurrence if businesses or trade sectors ended up being caught in something that was not fully considered beforehand.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
No problem.
I thank Sir Jonathan Jones, Dr Adam Tucker and Morag Ross KC for their extremely helpful evidence. The committee may follow up by letter any additional questions that stem from the meeting.
I suspend the meeting briefly to allow Morag Ross to leave the room and the other witnesses to leave BlueJeans.
11:17 Meeting suspended.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
11:20 Meeting continued in private until 11:41.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 32nd meeting in 2022 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. Before we move to the first item on the agenda, I remind everyone present to switch mobile phones to silent.
The first item of business is to decide whether to take item 6 in private. Is the committee content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
The instrument amends Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1793. In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee highlighted the omission of reference to a consultation provision, article 144(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625, from both the preamble of the instrument and accompanying documents.
The Scottish Government explained that, although the instrument does not cite article 144(7) in the preamble, there has been satisfaction of the precondition of consultation in that provision and fulfilment of the wider corresponding consultation in article 9 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002. Further, the consultation was sent directly to interested parties that are likely to be affected, which in the Scottish Government’s view meets the precondition requirements of article 9 and article 144(7).
Does the committee wish to note that, in line with normal drafting practice, the instrument should have cited all statutory preconditions?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, for a failure to follow proper drafting practice?
Members indicated agreement.