The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2097 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
My final question is on the negative procedure, which has been touched on. Regulations to preserve REUL are subject to the negative procedure whether they are made by the UK Parliament or the Scottish Parliament. Is the negative procedure appropriate for regulations that preserve REUL?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Jonathan Jones or Dr Tucker, do either of you have a view on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Dr Tucker wants to come in.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
You have just touched on our next area of discussion, which is about consultation with and consent by the Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament. That has come up at meetings of the lead committee, but for quite some time it has also regularly come up as an area of concern or frustration for Scotland as regards the UK Parliament. The bill allows the UK ministers to use the power to preserve REUL in devolved areas without the consent of, or without consulting, the Scottish ministers or the Scottish Parliament. Do the witnesses have any comments about what that will mean for dialogue and respecting devolution?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 33rd meeting of 2022 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We have received apologies from Jeremy Balfour. I remind everyone to switch their mobile phones to silent.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take items 5 and 6 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Given the comments that he has already made, the next question is probably more for Dr Tucker, but the other two witnesses are welcome to respond, too.
Could you give us your reflections on the extent to which Parliament, as opposed to ministers, will be able to influence what the statute book will look like as a result of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
I will bring in Bill Kidd, who has a question about clause 16.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Sir Jonathan, you mentioned the word litigation. Paul Sweeney’s question was about clause 8, but it made me think about the bill as a whole.
The word “uncertainty” has been used a lot by witnesses today, about what may or may not happen. Do witnesses expect litigation to take place because of the lack of clarity that is caused by the number of regulations and the volume of legislation that will be covered by the bill? There are 2,400 pieces of retained EU legislation and potentially another 1,400—possibly up to 5,000. I dare say that, at some point in the future, some organisations will operate and take decisions on the basis of what they think is the law, but potentially, because of the sunset clause, the initial law might not exist any more, because it will have fallen off the statute book. Do you expect an increase in litigation as a consequence of this legislation from the UK Government?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
The final area of questioning is on the issue of Henry VIII powers, which tend to bring some controversy any time they are spoken about.
Prior to the publication of the bill, the Public Law Project, in written evidence to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee’s inquiry into retained EU law, stated:
“A broad Henry VIII power for the UK Executive to make law in any area of former EU competence would be constitutionally inappropriate.”
The Scottish Parliament’s Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee, in its recent report titled “The Impact of Brexit on Devolution”, stated:
“The Committee’s view is that the extent of UK Ministers’ new delegated powers in devolved areas amounts to a significant constitutional change. We have considerable concerns that this has happened and is continuing to happen on an ad hoc and iterative basis without any overarching consideration of the impact on how devolution works.”
Do the witnesses have any comment about the Henry VIII nature of many of the powers contained in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stuart McMillan
Colleagues have no further questions. Do panel members have anything to put on the record that they have not already highlighted?